- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
Watch NowOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hello,
I am having trouble getting a destination NAT working for a VPN connection working. I am sure it is a simple issue, but I have been banging my head against the wall with it for a couple of days.
I have a domain based VPN for a site to site VPN. The VPN doman is configured and working as I can bring up the VPN for some other connections that are not using destination NAT. The Interoperable Device is configure with a VPN Domain that includes the "real" and "NAT IP":
Remote Local
192.168.2.10/32 10.0.0.0/8
10.191.34.10/32 10.0.0.0/8
The Access Policy is configure for testing to match from a host HTTP traffic with the VPN configured:
The NAT Policy is configured for a destination NAT from NAT_Server (192.168.2.10) to the H_Server (10.191.34.10)
My understanding is that this should map the NAT_Server (192.168.2.10) to the H_Server (10.191.34.10). This does appear to work as I see with "fw monitor" the traffic arriving on the firewall on the expected eth1 and trying to leave on the expected eth3:
The problem is that the packet stops on the outbound chain "o". In the log files I see the message about encryption failure: Different community ID, possible NAT problem (VPN Error code 01)
If someone is able to guide me in the right direction to solve this, it would be much appreciated.
Many thanks,
Looks like the issue from sk25867 "Different community ID, possible NAT problem (VPN Error code 02)" error on packet drop
There is also sk108600 VPN Site-to-Site with 3rd party that may help...
Hello,
I have been through many SKs, recently, but I will check them out. I believe I have not looked at sk108600 yet.
sk108600 is very helpfull for VPN with 3rd Party GWs.
Were you able to resolve the issue yet ?
Hi, I checked with support and Domain based VPN does not work when the encryption domains overlap.
That is certainly true 😉
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 19 | |
| 16 | |
| 7 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 |
Tue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY