Hi Checkmates
Today, we encountered an unexpected issue with our firewall policy deployment on R81.10. Despite undergoing rules verification, the policy was installed with an "any src, any dst, any port, action drop and do not log" rule. This oversight raises concerns about the effectiveness of the policy verification process specifically on R81.10.
Upon further testing, we found that policy verification functions correctly on other versions such as R80.40 and R81.20. However, this discrepancy on R81.10 is troubling, as it allowed traffic to be blocked below rule 142 without proper logging.
Please point me to the right direction