- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Maestro Masters
Round Table session with Maestro experts
Hello everyone.
We have a dual site setup with R81.10 JHF Take 172.
We noticed that when we make a change on SmartProvisioning and install the policy, only the active chassis receives the policy and updates the policy singature.
For example,
[Global] clish > asg policy verify -a
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Policy Verification |
+-------+-------------------+---------------+-----------------+--------+
|SGM |Policy Name |Policy Date |Policy Signature |Status |
+-------+-------------------+---------------+-----------------+--------+
|1_01 |Standard |14Apr25 09:44 |49c54a3e2 |Failed |
|2_01 |Standard |14Apr25 09:44 |e96b2c0b7 |Failed |
+-------+-------------------+---------------+-----------------+--------+
But when we install a policy without making any changes on SmartProvisioning, everything works, all gateways receive policy, same policy signatures. Example,
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Policy Verification |
+-------+-------------------+---------------+-----------------+--------+
|SGM |Policy Name |Policy Date |Policy Signature |Status |
+-------+-------------------+---------------+-----------------+--------+
|1_01 |Standard |17Apr25 01:17 |fde3508f3 |Success |
|2_01 |Standard |17Apr25 01:17 |fde3508f3 |Success |
+-------+-------------------+---------------+-----------------+--------+
We have been consistently able to replicate this. We thought it may be some sync problems, but policy installation without SP works perfectly fine, so it doesn't look like a sync issue. At leasst not when a normal policy is pushed.
asg diag verify only shows "Policy signature doesn't match on all SGMs" error and everything else is just "Passed". And we see that only after a policy push that contains a change in SP.
I'm not experienced in SmartProvisioning, maybe it has its own policy push mechanism besides SmartConsole or SmartUpdate. But I stand corrected here.
As always, any ideas are deeply appreciated.
Cheers!
Note - SmartProvisioning is not available for members of SmartLSM cluster
|
@Dario_Perez Thank you for pointing to that note. Now I have more questions 🙂
If I understand that statement correctly, I can manage a cluster via SmartLSM, but I can't manage individual members in a cluster. But even if that's the case, I'm having hard time understanding the difference between installing policy on a cluster and a single security group. Maybe I'm wrong in assuming that policy gets installed on a single object with a single IP (like the active member of a cluster or SMO in a security group).
In our case both chassis have the same security group, so it appears as a single gateway on SmartConsole (even simpler than a cluster).
Does that limitation really apply to security groups distributed to two chassis as well?
I believe SmartProvisioning (aka SmartLSM) is not supported with Maestro until R82
Interesting. I will confirm with TAC whether this is related to our case.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
User | Count |
---|---|
18 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
About CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY