- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Maestro Masters
- :
- Re: Maestro 140 Uplink topology
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Maestro 140 Uplink topology
Hi Expert,
We just win a project to implement single site Maestro, 2 MHO-140 and 3 SG6600.
From maestro getting started guide, it shows both MHOs is connected to a single switch or a vPC switch. But our customer environment is a dual layer2 switch and don't support vPC.
Can you help us confirmed MHO Uplink bond interface can operate in Active/Backup mode? And the topology is workable ?
Thanks!
Todd
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes active/backup on a bond is possible.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
That looks correct to me.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Logically yes, that would be my assumption as well.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, it did function just as you say.
If you can want to figure out which uplink interface is active in each bond interface, you can try to use this.
[Expert@XXXXXX-ch01-01:0]# more /proc/net/bonding/bond*| grep Current
Currently Active Slave: eth2-21
Currently Active Slave: eth2-23
Currently Active Slave: eth1-25
Currently Active Slave: eth2-27
Currently Active Slave: eth2-29
eth1 is an MHO-1 uplink interface
eth2 is an MHO-2 unlink interface
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes active/backup on a bond is possible.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
That looks correct to me.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you!
One more Question.
In the attached picture, when one of the MHO Active uplink is down, will traffic go to the other MHO ? Am I making the right assumption ?
Todd
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Logically yes, that would be my assumption as well.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, it did function just as you say.
If you can want to figure out which uplink interface is active in each bond interface, you can try to use this.
[Expert@XXXXXX-ch01-01:0]# more /proc/net/bonding/bond*| grep Current
Currently Active Slave: eth2-21
Currently Active Slave: eth2-23
Currently Active Slave: eth1-25
Currently Active Slave: eth2-27
Currently Active Slave: eth2-29
eth1 is an MHO-1 uplink interface
eth2 is an MHO-2 unlink interface
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Rick,
Thank you! The command is also helpful.
Regards,
Todd
