- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- General Topics
- :
- Re: encryption failure: Ike version: ikev2 not sup...
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
encryption failure: Ike version: ikev2 not supported for peer
Hi,
I'm trying to setup a Site-to-Site connection between Azure VPN and Checkpoint vSec (R77.30) on AWS.
I was able to setup a connection using Azure Basic gateway with IKEv1.
Now I'm trying to setup between Azure VPN (High Performance) gateway and Checkpoint vSec (R77.30).
High Performance gateway uses IKEv2 and have applied the following IKE policy on Azure Gateway.
Phase 1: AES256, SHA384, DH14, SA 28800
Phase 2: AES256, SHA256, PFS2048, SA 3600
I'm getting the error: encryption failure: Ike version: ikev2 not supported for peer
I'm new to checkpoint. Would be great if someone could tell me what the error means and if IKEv2 is even supported for the above Phase 1 and 2 parameters.
Thanks
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'd recommend the following VPN configuration within Check Point for initial testing:
As Phase 1 SA Lifetime is expressed by Check Point in minutes, while the Phase 2 SA Lifetime is expressed in seconds please make sure to enter 480 min (28800 sec).
If that doesn't help as well, please perform a IKE debug as described in sk112139 together with sk33327.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Danny,
I'll give your suggestions a try.
Thanks
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Danny, thanks for your suggestion, that got the VPN working.
Regards
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Great. I updated our Site-to-Site VPN Compatibility Matrix accordingly.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm pretty sure to use IKEv2 with Azure it must be a route-based VPN instead of domain-based. If you have CoreXL enabled on your gateway (which it is by default), you cannot do a route-based VPN on R77.30. Turning off CoreXL will slam all firewall inspection duties (not just VPN-related functions) onto one core no matter how many cores the firewall has. The performance impact of disabling CoreXL will range from minimal to utterly catastrophic depending on the total number of cores on the firewall.
If you upgrade the gateway to R80.10, route-based VPNs and CoreXL can be used together.
--
My book "Max Power: Check Point Firewall Performance Optimization"
now available via http://maxpowerfirewalls.com.
March 27th with sessions for both the EMEA and Americas time zones
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Tim,
Correct. I have route based VPN setup on Azure. The new gen VPN Gateways are only route based however applying IKE policy to the Azure connection enables gateway to establish connection to policy based devices.
I've also logged a support case with Azure support.
Thanks
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Ron,
I was wondering if you were able to share the configuration you used connecting to the Azure Basic VPN?
Many thanks
James
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hey James,
Its been over a year, I don't really remember the configuration I had, but let me dig through my notes and see what I find out. I don't have access to checkpoint device at present but happy to spin up a quick trial on AWS to test it out with Azure Basic GW 🙂
Thanks
Ron
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Ron,
That would be amazing if you could help me out!
Many thanks
James
