- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What's New in R82.10?
Watch HereWhen the Agents Attack
A Live Look at Agentic Exposure Validation
AI Security Masters E8:
Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber Security
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
What'll happened when i'll perform "fwaccel off"? Gateway just will more slowly process new connections?
As per sk162492 it will depend on the gateway version.
It will disable acceleration until turned back on or the gateway is rebooted, are you trying to troubleshoot something in particular?
Typically it is recommend to do this (only temporarily) out of peak times or with headroom to cater for a load increase.
If after running fwaccel off you find that whatever issue you have is solved, instead of turning of SecureXL for all traffic permanently via cpconfig, consider excluding the problematic IP address(es) from acceleration as described here:
sk104468: How to disable SecureXL for specific IP addresses
After defining this exclusion everything matching it will always go F2F/slowpath, which has the side effect of making the matched traffic fully visible if using fw monitor.
I have a TAC case right now where 3 specific IP addresses are involved all over port 8080, so I may use this. This traffic started misbehaving right when we went from 5800 to 9300 appliances. That being said what kind of debugs would be helpful in figuring out why acceleration isn't working for that traffic?
I assume you mean why these connections are misbehaving when partially/fully accelerated, this is not generally something you can troubleshoot easily without TAC as it can involve sim debugs which can easily hurt performance or kill the firewall.
What you could do is get a packet capture with fw monitor -F and also run fw ctl zdebug + drop while trying the problematic accelerated connections. Now put them into the slowpath via sk104468, run the debug commands again with the test traffic and see what is different. However you need to be mindful of the order in which you run these two debugging commands as they can interfere with each other, see here: Max Capture Update 2: Debug Filter Battle -- fw monitor -F vs. fw ctl zdebug + drop
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 12 | |
| 10 | |
| 9 | |
| 7 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Thu 09 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
Schutz souveräner Workloads: Check Point & die AWS European Sovereign CloudThu 09 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Edge Protection SD-WAN & SASEThu 09 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2026 #9 - What's New with Check Point Email SecurityFri 10 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (IDT)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 48: Nieuwe Check Point Workspace SecurityTue 14 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E11: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 3/5 - AI Workforce SecurityThu 30 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E12: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 4/5 - AI GatewayThu 09 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2026 #9 - What's New with Check Point Email SecurityFri 10 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (IDT)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 48: Nieuwe Check Point Workspace SecurityTue 14 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E11: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 3/5 - AI Workforce SecurityThu 30 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E12: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 4/5 - AI GatewayThu 20 Aug 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E13: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Ent 5/5 - AI Research & Threat LandscapeAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY