- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- General Topics
- :
- Re: Site to site tunnels CP <-> other vendors. Pos...
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Site to site tunnels CP <-> other vendors. Possible to see overview?
Hi everyone,
I think most of us have seen the news regarding the Fortinet vulnerabilities. Regarding this topic I got a very specific question from a customer. They asked if it possible to see what vendor is running on the other side of a site to site VPN tunnel. Many VPN tunnels are running on this CP gateway so maybe it possible to see it somehow. I suspect it is not possible, but maybe there are some creative ideas. Also nice to discuss this topic here.
The only way I can think of is that sometimes a VPN debug shows info. For example Check Point shows up in a debug:
Vendor ID Payload
Next Payload: NONE
Reserved: 0
Length: 00 2c (44)
VID Data:
VIDData:
-
Product: Check Point VPN-1
Version: NG with Application Intelligence R55 or above
If you like this post please give a thumbs up(kudo)! 🙂
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Maybe run a VPN debug and then look for the "Vendor ID" payload in the IKE exchange as defined in:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2408.html#page-43
Check for one you know its fortigate and see if it matches others.
not sure it's documented what ID each vendor has or if the value is carved in stone or might change depending on the version for example.
Here are some IDs:
https://svn.nmap.org/nmap/nselib/data/ike-fingerprints.lua
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Just ran below and it showed the vendor.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Maybe run a VPN debug and then look for the "Vendor ID" payload in the IKE exchange as defined in:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2408.html#page-43
Check for one you know its fortigate and see if it matches others.
not sure it's documented what ID each vendor has or if the value is carved in stone or might change depending on the version for example.
Here are some IDs:
https://svn.nmap.org/nmap/nselib/data/ike-fingerprints.lua
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I believe as @Machine_Head had said, only debug might show you the info, otherwise, I doubt it. I know Danny Jung wrote some amazing scripts about vpn tunnels overview, will test them later to see if it gives any additional info.
Best,
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Just ran below and it showed the vendor.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Any,
Also checked but I get the following:
FROM <=> TO STATE VPN_COMMUNITY PEER_IP SOURCE_IP LINK_PRIORITY PROB_STATE PEER_TYPE VPN_TYPE
=============================================================================================================================================================
FW-NAME <=> gw-3party UP vpn-NAME REMOTE_IP LOCAL_IP Primary ? Regular Regular
How does your output look like? Had to remove some sensitive info above.
Don't see a vendor ID?
Running R81.20 take 41
Lesley
If you like this post please give a thumbs up(kudo)! 🙂
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hey Lesley,
I dont see field for vendor ID, but name is definitely there.
An(d) y 🙂
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Andy,
You did the same!! 🙂 🙂
Hey Lesey,
I dont see field for vendor ID, but name is definitely there.
---
My output is maybe different, to bad. I will proceed with the debug and collect the ID's.
Thanks again for the tips!
If you like this post please give a thumbs up(kudo)! 🙂
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I did, but I swear, it was NOT on purpose lol...I corrected it as soon as I noticed my mistake. I learned making sure peoples' names are spelled and pronounced correctly as sign of respect.
Best,
Andy
