- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- General Topics
- :
- Remote Access encryption domain
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Remote Access encryption domain
Good Day everyone. Added to the encryption domain group object for the first time in years, and seeing weird behavior. Prior to my change, the group has a slew of /24 networks, and /32 hosts configed - no issue. Added a few /24 networks, and I'm seeing them carved up - 192.168.26.0 /24 is an example - here's what i get in my routing table after i connect via CP Mobile:
192.168.26.0 255.255.255.255 172.27.253.253 172.27.253.254 1
192.168.26.4 255.255.255.252 172.27.253.253 172.27.253.254 1
192.168.26.8 255.255.255.248 172.27.253.253 172.27.253.254 1
192.168.26.16 255.255.255.240 172.27.253.253 172.27.253.254 1
192.168.26.32 255.255.255.224 172.27.253.253 172.27.253.254 1
192.168.26.64 255.255.255.192 172.27.253.253 172.27.253.254 1
192.168.26.128 255.255.255.128 172.27.253.253 172.27.253.254 1
I've set "enable_supernet_per_community" to both 0 & 1, neither helped. Clearly i'm missing something.
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
thanks
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Are there IPs in use on either the client or gateway that overlap with these subjects?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Phoneboy makes a good point...overlapping domains.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you both for your replies, much appreciated.
I wasn't receiving the policy push warning about overlapping domains, but when i ran "vpn overlap_encdom" on the gateway, i saw that there is quite a few.
Here is the layout - I have (8) internal sites that all participate in a meshed community. Each of them have their locally connected networks as their encryption domain. I also have the gateway serving as the public facing remote access concentrator, this gateway is not part of the mesh community - this gateway has for its encryption domain every network at every location it can see (including its own locally connected networks). So...when i ran the "vpn overlap_encdom" command - it had entries for every location. Is there a correct way to resolve this?
All versions are 80.40 hfa91
thanks.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Check below...not sure if it applies, but I would need to see it on remote session if you are willing to show me the exact issue...
Andy
