Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Alex-
Leader Leader
Leader

R82 and VMWare Paravirtual

sk104848 about VMWare best practices still recommends in bold VMWare LSI Logic SAS/Parallel.

 

However, it states that since R82, Paravirtual is supported.

 

We tried to deploy a VMWare-based SMS with Paravirtual and RH-8 as baseline, the whole process was really fast, jumbo installation, import and so on. No issues were observed afterwards.

 

So, is it just that the SK is a bit noncommittal and prudent or can we just get ahead and actually recommend Paravirtual for R82 VMWare deployments? Other caveats?

0 Kudos
4 Replies
the_rock
Legend
Legend

Hey Alex,

Personally, if I were you, I would definitely confirm with your SE about this. I see sk was last updated November 2024, so its been 9 months now, but your assumption sounds totally logical to me. when it comes to R82.

Andy

0 Kudos
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

I'll see if we can get this clarified in the SK.
Having said that, I'm with you that the Paravirtual drivers are definitely faster.

Alex-
Leader Leader
Leader

Thanks, it looks like full support is there and clarifying the SK will appease customers.

 

 dmesg | grep -I pvscsi
# vmw_pvscsi: using 64bit dma
# vmw_pvscsi: max_id: 65
# vmw_pvscsi: setting ring_pages to 32
# vmw_pvscsi: enabling reqCallThreshold
# vmw_pvscsi: driver-based request coalescing enabled
# vmw_pvscsi: using MSI-X
# vmw_pvscsi 0000:02:00.0: VMware PVSCSI rev 2 host #0
0 Kudos
Alex-
Leader Leader
Leader

More SMS done in Paravirtual, no issues. The SK could benefit being clarified.

0 Kudos

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events