- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
Watch NowOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hi,
a question came up if it is possible to lock an network object/group object to prevent this from 'overriding or modifying'. I really mean on object level and not on admin permission profiles or similar.
So, basically the wish to add/use this object in any rule, but should not be possible to modify the object itself without a command/api call.
I tried the api call 'mgmt_cli lock-object'. However, after publishing the session, the lock was reset automatically.
-> see attachement
Is there any better idea/solution?
Thanks
Regards
The whole idea of a locked object is not to publish that session. Did you try that?
hi, not really. The idea behind was that the object can't be overwritten by some admins or api calls.
Regards
A lock on an object only lasts until the session holding the lock is published or discarded. You can lock the object and log out without publishing.
That said, someone might see the lock, see who has it locked, and discard the session so they can make a change. This isn't a way to restrict the ability to change an object, it's only a guardrail against accidental changes.
Exactly what @Bob_Zimmerman said! Exit the script without publishing the session. The object will remain locked till you publish or discard that session.
It becomes complicated if you want to do this for multiple objects.
Either you have 1 session per object left open and you will find that you run into problems due to the large number of open sessions.
Or you have to automate it and release the previous session and re lock the objects. with the inherent chance someone will beat you to it and lock one just before your script got to it.
So it is a sort of a finger in the dijk solution. It work with one small hole but ties you up as part of it. So choose wisely how to use it. I see way to many ways in which this can go wrong and turn against you.
The suggestion of a MDS with just 1 domain might have some merits for this purpose. Be it it has it's own challenges.
global objects in MDS enviroment 🙂
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 12 | |
| 10 | |
| 9 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 |
Tue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY