- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- General Topics
- :
- Re: IKEV2 With Cisco ASA
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
IKEV2 With Cisco ASA
I have a pair of FW on Azure infrastructure. However, I'm not able to establish VPN using IKEV2 from the checkpoint FW to Cisco ASA.
Anyone set VPN up with Cisco ASA before using IKEv2?
Regards
Kayode
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This really is not a lot to go on, but I believe I have done this in the past.
Take a look at this old thread in CPUG:
and see if anything there can be of use to troubleshoot.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
My experience with Cisco is that setting up a VPN tunnel is very difficult, because Cisco is very strict with it's configuration.
Most of the time you have a encryption domain mismatch, thus why I would recommend to request the CLI configuration of said Cisco ASA, which will show you how it is exactly configured.
My recommendation is to first configure a (Domain-based) VPN IPSec Tunnel
After that has been setup, see if the tunnel comes up by initiating traffic.
If not, perform an IKE debug and to read it with IKEVIEW (Check Point tool).
If it is a mismatch in encryption domains, you have to modify the user.def to specify exactly what should be negotiated.
The following SK's will help you with the troubleshooting:
- Location of crypt.def: sk98241
- Location of user.def: sk98239
- Configure encryption domains to negotiate sk108600 - Scenario1
- What information is required to troubleshoot the VPN related issues? sk40114
- How to generate a valid VPN debug, IKE debug and FW Monitor: sk33327
- IKEView utility: sk30994
Hope this helps!
Kind regards,
Sean
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello Mate,
May thanks for your contribution.
Just to add more context to my question, on the checkpoint FW side, the requirement is to hide our internal LAN and so we’ve been asked to NAT to another Private Subnet so this can be advertised as VPN domain. This looks like Private to Private NAT. The traffic looks like this:
CHECKPOINT LAN (10.151.X.X)---->Private subnet (172.x.x.x/24)Public IP (52.X.X.X)------VPN(IKEv2)----->Public (208.X.X.X)Private subnet (207.x.x.x/24) ASA
Any suggestion on how to make this happen will be of great help.
Regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Tip:
- use IKEv1
- use lower DH groups for example 5
- use main mode
- check first with PSK
- check same phase 1 and phase 2 settings
- check supernet issues
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
As a best practice, it is now recommended to use DH 14 or higher.
The lower the DH group, the easier the keys can be cracked.
