Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Tommy_Forrest
Advisor
Jump to solution

Does anyone ever go back and review install guides for relevance?

Are there any processes Check Point follows to go back and review install guides?

Reason I ask - this install guide is out of date with regards to "zero downtime" updates.

https://downloads.checkpoint.com/fileserver/SOURCE/direct/ID/103841/FILE/CP_R81_Installation_and_Upg...

Page 406 is where it starts talking about doing a zero downtime upgrade by setting ccp to broadcast.

Problem is in R80.40 that's deprecated for mvc.

Now, it's been a super long minute.  Probably an hour since I've upgraded stand alone clusters.  And I'd totally forgotten about mvc.  A quick dip into clish and abusing the tab key reminded me about mvc.

For which a search on my favorite search engine returned this version of the R81 install & upgrade guide:

https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_Installation_and_Upgrade_Guide/Top...

Which talks about using mvc.

So, why 2 versions of the admin guide?  And why isn't the first admin guide removed or updated when things are deprecated?

 

0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

The web and PDF versions should be generated from the same source and contain the same content.
If you look here, you'll see the same section you referred to by page number: https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_Installation_and_Upgrade_Guide/Top... 

To answer the question about the process for reviewing the Install and Upgrade Guide, I can't comment specifically on that.
However, I recommend you send specific feedback to our Tech Pubs team and they can address the issue.

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
12 Replies
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

The web and PDF versions should be generated from the same source and contain the same content.
If you look here, you'll see the same section you referred to by page number: https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_Installation_and_Upgrade_Guide/Top... 

To answer the question about the process for reviewing the Install and Upgrade Guide, I can't comment specifically on that.
However, I recommend you send specific feedback to our Tech Pubs team and they can address the issue.

0 Kudos
Tommy_Forrest
Advisor

Thanks PhoneBoy, I'll reach out to them.

Seems like someone should go in and remove content that is clearly deprecated.  Or put a pointer in to send you to mvc.

 

the_rock
Legend
Legend

Agree 100%. I will say though when it comes to cluster upgrades, I always do zero downtime upgrade and works flawlessly. I never even bother changing CCP mode.

0 Kudos
Tommy_Forrest
Advisor

In my experience if you don't use MVC, it'll "work".  But you're going to have an interruption in services while the newly upgraded firewall gets back on its feet and reestablishes session states.

If you're just supporting people web browsing, it's no big deal, they'll likely never notice.  But other traffic flows aren't so forgiving (thinking things like SIP here) in that disruption and people will notice.

0 Kudos
the_rock
Legend
Legend

Had done few cluster upgrades with lots of voip traffic goint through them and never had a problem, always done zero downtime upgrade method.

0 Kudos
_Val_
Admin
Admin

AFAIK, zero downtime upgrade path is still valid. Why would you say it is deprecated? Based on what?

0 Kudos
Tommy_Forrest
Advisor

Step 1 - "On each Cluster Member, change the CCP mode to Broadcast"

A gateway running 80.40 promptly returns CCP mode is deprecated and invalid when you attempt to set CCP mode to Broadcast.

0 Kudos
_Val_
Admin
Admin

You have a point. Tech writes are looking into this.

0 Kudos
Tommy_Forrest
Advisor

Thanks, Val.  I reached out to them last night as well.

I've seen other cases in the past where stuff like this gets by and was just curious if there were any procedures to keep these docs up to date.  In some cases, like SK articles, it's easy to notify someone.  PDF's not so much.

0 Kudos
Sergei_Shir
Employee
Employee

You can submit your feedback from any Admin Guide (HTML or PDF)

Because PDF is a more limited format, you need to go to the page "Important Information" - above the table "Revision History" there is a link to send us feedback

In HTML, you can send us feedback from each page - from the topic top toolbar, click the "envelope" icon

 

Thank you

0 Kudos
the_rock
Legend
Legend

You are 100% correct. I experienced same in my lab before and when I chose to ignore it (meaning I omitted that command), still worked fine.

0 Kudos
G_W_Albrecht
Legend
Legend

Important - The Multi-Version Cluster Upgrade replaced the Connectivity Upgrade.

So, Minimal Effort Upgrade and Zero Downtime Upgrade are still supported procedures...

CCSE CCTE CCSM SMB Specialist

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events