- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Access Control and Threat Prevention Best Practices
5 November @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Firewall Uptime, Reimagined
How AIOps Simplifies Operations and Prevents Outages
Overlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Spark Management Portal and More!
Are there any processes Check Point follows to go back and review install guides?
Reason I ask - this install guide is out of date with regards to "zero downtime" updates.
Page 406 is where it starts talking about doing a zero downtime upgrade by setting ccp to broadcast.
Problem is in R80.40 that's deprecated for mvc.
Now, it's been a super long minute. Probably an hour since I've upgraded stand alone clusters. And I'd totally forgotten about mvc. A quick dip into clish and abusing the tab key reminded me about mvc.
For which a search on my favorite search engine returned this version of the R81 install & upgrade guide:
Which talks about using mvc.
So, why 2 versions of the admin guide? And why isn't the first admin guide removed or updated when things are deprecated?
The web and PDF versions should be generated from the same source and contain the same content.
If you look here, you'll see the same section you referred to by page number: https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_Installation_and_Upgrade_Guide/Top... 
To answer the question about the process for reviewing the Install and Upgrade Guide, I can't comment specifically on that.
However, I recommend you send specific feedback to our Tech Pubs team and they can address the issue.
The web and PDF versions should be generated from the same source and contain the same content.
If you look here, you'll see the same section you referred to by page number: https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81_Installation_and_Upgrade_Guide/Top... 
To answer the question about the process for reviewing the Install and Upgrade Guide, I can't comment specifically on that.
However, I recommend you send specific feedback to our Tech Pubs team and they can address the issue.
Thanks PhoneBoy, I'll reach out to them.
Seems like someone should go in and remove content that is clearly deprecated. Or put a pointer in to send you to mvc.
Agree 100%. I will say though when it comes to cluster upgrades, I always do zero downtime upgrade and works flawlessly. I never even bother changing CCP mode.
In my experience if you don't use MVC, it'll "work". But you're going to have an interruption in services while the newly upgraded firewall gets back on its feet and reestablishes session states.
If you're just supporting people web browsing, it's no big deal, they'll likely never notice. But other traffic flows aren't so forgiving (thinking things like SIP here) in that disruption and people will notice.
Had done few cluster upgrades with lots of voip traffic goint through them and never had a problem, always done zero downtime upgrade method.
AFAIK, zero downtime upgrade path is still valid. Why would you say it is deprecated? Based on what?
Step 1 - "On each Cluster Member, change the CCP mode to Broadcast"
A gateway running 80.40 promptly returns CCP mode is deprecated and invalid when you attempt to set CCP mode to Broadcast.
You have a point. Tech writes are looking into this.
Thanks, Val. I reached out to them last night as well.
I've seen other cases in the past where stuff like this gets by and was just curious if there were any procedures to keep these docs up to date. In some cases, like SK articles, it's easy to notify someone. PDF's not so much.
You can submit your feedback from any Admin Guide (HTML or PDF)
Because PDF is a more limited format, you need to go to the page "Important Information" - above the table "Revision History" there is a link to send us feedback
In HTML, you can send us feedback from each page - from the topic top toolbar, click the "envelope" icon
Thank you
You are 100% correct. I experienced same in my lab before and when I chose to ignore it (meaning I omitted that command), still worked fine.
Important - The Multi-Version Cluster Upgrade replaced the Connectivity Upgrade.
So, Minimal Effort Upgrade and Zero Downtime Upgrade are still supported procedures...
 
					
				
				
			
		
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count | 
|---|---|
| 28 | |
| 16 | |
| 16 | |
| 15 | |
| 9 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | 
Wed 05 Nov 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EST)
TechTalk: Access Control and Threat Prevention Best PracticesThu 06 Nov 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
CheckMates Live BeLux: Get to Know Veriti – What It Is, What It Does, and Why It MattersTue 11 Nov 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - AMERTue 11 Nov 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CST)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - EMEAAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY