- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
7 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
What's New in Check Point SASE
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
AI Security Masters
Implementing the AI Security Trifecta
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
Hi community;
I want to cluster 2 1600 series devices, but I only have one public ip address. Solution proposed with this sk: https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk32073
Does this solution apply to the 1600 series?
Based on the sk, it is possible, BUT, note below notice.
Andy
Below is what you need to follow:
Based on the sk, it is possible, BUT, note below notice.
Andy
Below is what you need to follow:
Thanks the_rock
Ok, I will check and read my device version. I just wanted to know It is possible. thanks for your answer.
regards.
No worries. Process is almost the same as back in R55 days, honestly, not much has changes as far as things you need to do.
Andy
Hi @the_rock
I have complated configuration but I hava a few quation.
This picture my HA configuration.
I did configuration for internet-1 and internet-2 as int the picture and other local networks. Different services are running on public ip addresses and there NAT rules.bIs best practise right this configuration?
Can I make my configuration better because sometimes my NAT sevices are not working properly.
Q1: Are the primary and secondary ip addresses to be used for internet interfaces public or private in accordance with best practice? I preferred to use 10.x.x.x.x.
Well, you just have to make sure that NAT and routing are correct as per articles we provided. If you follow whats in there, it will work, for sure.
Andy
Ok thnaks. My NAT and Route ryles are working, no problem now. But I cannot select ISP (internet ip) for Remote Access. For example: I want to use 212.x.x.x ip address for remote access. Is there ip selection on these device (quantum spark 1600)? I could not find admin guide.
Admin Guide link: https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/SMB_R81.10.05/Help/Locally_Managed/EN/Content/Topics/Configurin...
Not that Im aware of on locally managed SMB appliances. You may want to confirm with TAC, but I will spin up demo soon and verify myself as well.
Andy
Ok @the_rock thanks. I will be waiting your answer if you verify on demo.
I just spun up quick demo (takes 5 mins from support site) and I dont see such an option anywhere, sorry. As I stated, maybe verify 100% with TAC.
Andy
Ok @the_rock thanks for repling. I will contact TAC.
Let us know what they say.
Andy
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 25 | |
| 18 | |
| 16 | |
| 13 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 |
Wed 23 Sep 2026 @ 06:00 PM (EDT)
Santo Domingo: Workspace Security and SASE Live: Protección Total del Usuario Email, Endpoint y SASEMon 28 Sep 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
La nouvelle réalité des attaques DDoS: autonomie, échelle et avenir de la défenseMon 28 Sep 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
La nouvelle réalité des attaques DDoS: autonomie, échelle et avenir de la défenseThu 01 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point WAF | Preventing minus-zero-day attacksWed 23 Sep 2026 @ 06:00 PM (EDT)
Santo Domingo: Workspace Security and SASE Live: Protección Total del Usuario Email, Endpoint y SASEAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY