- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Policy Insights and Policy Auditor in Action
19 November @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Access Control and Threat Prevention Best Practices
Watch HereOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
We need to restrict the editing of all rules from a certain section tittle for other administrators, and that they can only be edited by admin. Is it possible to do this in Check Point?
Granting permission for a specific section of the rulebase is not feasible. However, you can explore the following alternatives:
Implement Ordered Layers and assign distinct Permission Profiles to each layer.
Transition to Multi-Domain Security Management, which allows you to utilize a Global Domain for a particular policy segment, while the Domain level administrator handles the remaining sections.
If you can send a screenshot and circle what you want to di, I can test it in my lab.
Andy
For example, administrators other than Administator cannot edit 1-13 rules
I have an hour before my next call, so stand by, let me see if this is possible.
Cheers,
Andy
Granting permission for a specific section of the rulebase is not feasible. However, you can explore the following alternatives:
Implement Ordered Layers and assign distinct Permission Profiles to each layer.
Transition to Multi-Domain Security Management, which allows you to utilize a Global Domain for a particular policy segment, while the Domain level administrator handles the remaining sections.
Implement Ordered Layers and assign distinct Permission Profiles to each layer.
Could you describe this process in more detail?
Thank you I have figured out the technology in question.
I think what @Tal_Paz-Fridman said makes sense. I looked for any setting related to being able to possible prevent given admin from modifying regular rule(s), but it does not appear to exist anywhere.
Its definitely good candidate for RFE, in my view.
Andy
Yeah, that's what I thought, too. MDS implementation is quite difficult in terms of time, while layers implementation is simple. We will try this option, thanks
Directly, no.
However, through use of a SmartTask like https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Management/SmartTask-Custom-Permissions/m-p/77247#M11281, it should be possible.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 42 | |
| 21 | |
| 10 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 |
Thu 20 Nov 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - AMERThu 20 Nov 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CST)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - EMEAWed 26 Nov 2025 @ 12:00 PM (COT)
Panama City: Risk Management a la Parrilla: ERM, TEM & Meat LunchThu 20 Nov 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - AMERThu 20 Nov 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CST)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasWed 26 Nov 2025 @ 12:00 PM (COT)
Panama City: Risk Management a la Parrilla: ERM, TEM & Meat LunchAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY