- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Step Into the Future of
AI-Powered Cyber Security
When the Agents Attack
A Live Look at Agentic Exposure Validation
Bridge the CAASM Gap
with Exposure Management
AI Security Masters E8:
Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber Security
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
We need to restrict the editing of all rules from a certain section tittle for other administrators, and that they can only be edited by admin. Is it possible to do this in Check Point?
Granting permission for a specific section of the rulebase is not feasible. However, you can explore the following alternatives:
Implement Ordered Layers and assign distinct Permission Profiles to each layer.
Transition to Multi-Domain Security Management, which allows you to utilize a Global Domain for a particular policy segment, while the Domain level administrator handles the remaining sections.
If you can send a screenshot and circle what you want to di, I can test it in my lab.
Andy
For example, administrators other than Administator cannot edit 1-13 rules
I have an hour before my next call, so stand by, let me see if this is possible.
Cheers,
Andy
Granting permission for a specific section of the rulebase is not feasible. However, you can explore the following alternatives:
Implement Ordered Layers and assign distinct Permission Profiles to each layer.
Transition to Multi-Domain Security Management, which allows you to utilize a Global Domain for a particular policy segment, while the Domain level administrator handles the remaining sections.
Implement Ordered Layers and assign distinct Permission Profiles to each layer.
Could you describe this process in more detail?
Thank you I have figured out the technology in question.
I think what @Tal_Paz-Fridman said makes sense. I looked for any setting related to being able to possible prevent given admin from modifying regular rule(s), but it does not appear to exist anywhere.
Its definitely good candidate for RFE, in my view.
Andy
Yeah, that's what I thought, too. MDS implementation is quite difficult in terms of time, while layers implementation is simple. We will try this option, thanks
Im fairly sure this is what @Tal_Paz-Fridman was referring to.
Andy
Directly, no.
However, through use of a SmartTask like https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/Management/SmartTask-Custom-Permissions/m-p/77247#M11281, it should be possible.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 8 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
Wed 10 Jun 2026 @ 01:00 PM (EDT)
Deep Dive: When the Agents Attack: A Live Look at Agentic Exposure ValidationThu 11 Jun 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2026 #8: Say Yes to AI Without Saying Yes to RiskFri 12 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 47: Continuous Threat Exposure ManagementTue 16 Jun 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point SASE | Internet Access Optimization & Performance TuningWed 10 Jun 2026 @ 01:00 PM (EDT)
Deep Dive: When the Agents Attack: A Live Look at Agentic Exposure ValidationThu 11 Jun 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2026 #8: Say Yes to AI Without Saying Yes to RiskFri 12 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 47: Continuous Threat Exposure ManagementTue 16 Jun 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point SASE | Internet Access Optimization & Performance TuningThu 18 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point WAF - The Next Generation of AI powered protectionAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY