- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What's New in R82.10?
Watch HereWhen the Agents Attack
A Live Look at Agentic Exposure Validation
AI Security Masters E8:
Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber Security
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
Hi mates,
Again, missed me ? 😞
I have a requirement that kinds of blows me away.
SO .. 3 routers. A, B (Check Point) and C
B receives from C and advertise to A but with a "catch".
Routes from C are marked with a community of 1:1 (It's a Cisco).
On Check Point we need the following:
if routes are received from C with community 1:1 then redistribute them to A with a MED of 50
if routes have a different community (or no community) inject them in CKP routing table
If routes are received with community 1:2 then redistribute them to A with a MED of 200
This is where I'm stuck: Check Point doesn't do community in that format therefore I've asked the customer to create route-maps on Cisco and set for 1:1 100 and for 1:2 200
But know I have no idea how to do redistribution with different MEDs based on what's inbound.
In Cisco World will be simple but here it blows my mind and I have horse vision right now (I've struggled with it whole weekend)
Any advice is as usual really appreciated!!
I need first to upgrade my SMS and then blink R82. But again, since I'm stunned about this it doesn't matter if it will take 30 minutes or 4 hours.
I need to test this!
Please share your TAC SR number so we can look internally - thanks.
The issue has been identified and is planned for a future JHF (PRJ-64616).
Excellent Chris, thanks for letting us know!
Wow. Just wow.
Thanks for letting me know. I will track that on JHF releases.
So a month went by, Take 60 was released and has no fix included 😞 Just tested a couple of minutes ago and the issue is still there.
How long do I have to wait for something so small to be included in a major release ? I'm thinking of trying R82.10 to see if it was fixed there.
Ask TAC or your SE to follow-up the ETA for you since you had an SR previously.
I did not see anything for it in R82.10 release notes, but worth asking TAC.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 13 | |
| 12 | |
| 9 | |
| 7 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Thu 09 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
Schutz souveräner Workloads: Check Point & die AWS European Sovereign CloudThu 09 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Edge Protection SD-WAN & SASEThu 09 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2026 #9 - What's New with Check Point Email SecurityFri 10 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (IDT)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 48: Nieuwe Check Point Workspace SecurityTue 14 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E11: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 3/5 - AI Workforce SecurityThu 30 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E12: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 4/5 - AI GatewayThu 09 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2026 #9 - What's New with Check Point Email SecurityFri 10 Jul 2026 @ 11:00 AM (IDT)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 48: Nieuwe Check Point Workspace SecurityTue 14 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E11: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 3/5 - AI Workforce SecurityThu 30 Jul 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E12: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Enterprise 4/5 - AI GatewayThu 20 Aug 2026 @ 10:00 AM (PDT)
AI Security Masters E13: READY OR NOT: Securing the AI Ent 5/5 - AI Research & Threat LandscapeAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY