- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Step Into the Future of
AI-Powered Cyber Security
When the Agents Attack
A Live Look at Agentic Exposure Validation
Bridge the CAASM Gap
with Exposure Management
AI Security Masters E8:
Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber Security
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
Hi,
I want to make Nat Rule for redundancy ISP for out going traffic. I have 2 ISP and Objects are Statically nated with their respective IP from ISP.I want configure a fail over nat rule. Is it possible or any other solution will be help full.
* ISPs are terminated in a Cisco Wan Switch and Checkpoint is connected directly with Wan Switch.
GW version 81.20
Is it a single ISP or the same ISP with two different NAT numbers?
If they are different ISPs, you should be able to accomplish this via ISP Redundancy.
See: https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk34812
Otherwise, you should use a Dynamic Object in your NAT rule instead (which is what ISP Redundancy ultimately does).
You'll need to write a script to update the contents of this Dynamic Object using the dynamic_objects CLI command on each gateway that uses this object.
However, this gives you flexibility as to how and when to "fail over" the NAT.
Is it a single ISP or the same ISP with two different NAT numbers?
If they are different ISPs, you should be able to accomplish this via ISP Redundancy.
See: https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk34812
Otherwise, you should use a Dynamic Object in your NAT rule instead (which is what ISP Redundancy ultimately does).
You'll need to write a script to update the contents of this Dynamic Object using the dynamic_objects CLI command on each gateway that uses this object.
However, this gives you flexibility as to how and when to "fail over" the NAT.
Thank you..
If i configure two IP from different ISPs in a sigle dynamic object.Does NAT will failover to another IP automatically if one ISP fail ?
Configuring more than one IP in a Dynamic Object used in this manner won't fail over.
The script you write will determine the failover conditions and what IP is used in what case.
When you say make NAT rules for ISP redundancy, you mean create different nat rules based on what subnets would go out of which ISP link?
Or did I misunderstand that totally?
Andy
In this case, you don't need two rules, you only need one...in terms of the Dynamic Object you've created.
The Dynamic Object will determine what the IP will ultimately be translated to.
Never knew that was possible...would you mind attach a screenshot of what nat rule would look like in case like that?
Cheers,
Andy
The "translated source" would contain the Dynamic Object you created.
It's otherwise like any other NAT rule.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 8 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 |
Wed 10 Jun 2026 @ 01:00 PM (EDT)
Deep Dive: When the Agents Attack: A Live Look at Agentic Exposure ValidationThu 11 Jun 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2026 #8: Say Yes to AI Without Saying Yes to RiskFri 12 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 47: Continuous Threat Exposure ManagementTue 16 Jun 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point SASE | Internet Access Optimization & Performance TuningWed 10 Jun 2026 @ 01:00 PM (EDT)
Deep Dive: When the Agents Attack: A Live Look at Agentic Exposure ValidationThu 11 Jun 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Tips and Tricks 2026 #8: Say Yes to AI Without Saying Yes to RiskFri 12 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 47: Continuous Threat Exposure ManagementTue 16 Jun 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
Under the Hood: Check Point SASE | Internet Access Optimization & Performance TuningThu 18 Jun 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point WAF - The Next Generation of AI powered protectionAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY