Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
TSOL
Collaborator
Jump to solution

About the display of GW configured with ClusterXL in R81.20

Hello Team

 

We are configuring ClusterXL and have a question because there is a GW whose cluster member status remains as '—'.

When I looked at Checkpoint's demo site, the status of the GW on SmartConsole with ClusterXL configured appears as '—' in the attached image.

Is this normal for ClusterXL?

Or should a green check mark be displayed for each cluster member to indicate normal status?

 

Thank you for the advice.

0 Kudos
1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
_Val_
Admin
Admin

Yes it is as supposed to be

View solution in original post

0 Kudos
4 Replies
AkosBakos
Advisor

Hi @TSOL 

  • The initiate of the SIC was successful?
    • Did you test it?
  • Did you push policy to the new Cluster?
    • If yes, can you push policy again?
      • What rules are set in the policy? 
      • Maybe you locked out yourself?
        • if yes -> user #fwunloadlocal command to uninstall the policy from the GW-s
  • what does the #cphaprob stat say?

Can you ping the GW-s from the MGMT?

Akos

----------------
\m/_(>_<)_\m/
0 Kudos
TSOL
Collaborator

Thank you for the advice.

Does this mean that the '-' state is not normal?

.SIC status is "trust established".

.The policy is a test policy, so it's set to any/any accept.
.No, I don't think it's locked out.
.cphaprob state is no problem, maybe.

0 Kudos
AkosBakos
Advisor

Hi @TSOL 

No, '-' this is not normal

If you choose "test sic status" it says "Communicating"

If you login to one of the cluster members, what is the exact output of the cphaprob stat command?

Cheers,

Akos

----------------
\m/_(>_<)_\m/
_Val_
Admin
Admin

Yes it is as supposed to be

0 Kudos

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events