- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
7 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
AI Security Masters
LGTM: Bypassing an LLM Build Gate
When Prompt Injection Fails
What's New in Check Point SASE
The State of Ransomware Q2 2026:
This Quarter's Trends, and Their Impact on Your Defenses
CheckMates Go:
Half is Not Enough
Good Day expert,
I am using checkpoint r81.10.
I recently did a large amount creation and modification to rule base and nat entries and would like to vet all the changes before installing the policy.
I publish the entries but would like to print or export same but do noy know how to this.
I humble seek guidance.
Thank you
Regards
Start with having a look at the Changes Report:
Please also refer to the following SK:
| How to view changes performed between revisions |
Start with having a look at the Changes Report:
Hello chris,
Thanks for the answer it suggestion worked i was able to print the items that were publish but not yet installed. I very well formatted report (Changes Report) was generated and printed.
I have another question if the policy was installed is there any way I can retrieve the committed changes in nicely formatted report similar the to (changes report ) ?
Regards
Thanks for the guildance you suggestion work perfectly.
Thanks for the help.
I have another question if the changes were conmitted (the policy install) is there a way to retrieve the report (the same nicely formatted report?
Again, use the Changes Report for this.
You will have to manually select the revision you just installed and the revision you wish to compare it with as described in the SK.
If you made changes to NAT through the objects themselves (i.e. Automatic NAT rules), they will show up as changes to the objects themselves.
This is expected behavior.
If you made changes to manual NAT rules and they aren't showing up in the report, then I recommend a TAC case.
Easier way to find this:
Please also refer to the following SK:
| How to view changes performed between revisions |
I think what @Chris_Atkinson gave you is your best bet, for sure.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 32 | |
| 9 | |
| 7 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 |
Tue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEATue 06 Oct 2026 @ 02:00 PM (EDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus AMERTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 12:00 PM (ACDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus APACTue 06 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (CEST)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus EMEATue 06 Oct 2026 @ 02:00 PM (EDT)
Rethinking Network Security for the AI Era : Session 2 - From User, to Branch and Campus AMERThu 08 Oct 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Under the Hood: Check Point SASE | Zero Trust Network Access, Step by StepAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY