- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
Watch NowOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
we have two different installation which we notice this strange behaviour...one is running on r81 (latest jumbo) and the second on R80.40 (also on latest jumbo)...both installations where upgraded to this target version from an older version (in-place upgarde)...the standby node sends all outgoing traffic (allthough there is a default gateway pointing to the isp's router) to the active firewall node and this through the dedicated sync interface...
does anyone out there has experience the same issue/behaviour?
thanks...
sk167453: Traffic from the Standby member to any other host goes through the SYNC interface
sk167453: Traffic from the Standby member to any other host goes through the SYNC interface
hi günther,
thanks for this link...it looks like that this is the situation...good to know this...was not aware of it...thanks
cheers
This topic has been raised here earlier and this means this change is not well documented in upgrade documents or in the release notes. Only knowing the kernel parameter's name already, I was able to find a small note about this change under 'Software changes' chapter of 'R80.40 Release Notes', but it is not mentioned under What's New -> Clustering, which would be a logical place to mention behavioral changes of ClusterXL.
https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R80.40/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R80.40_RN/Topics-RN/Software-Update...
ClusterXL - the default value of the parameter "fwha_cluster_hide_active_only" was changed from 0 to 1. For more information, see sk169154 > Section 3.4 - Standby member's connections.
They should have added a clear statement that traffic from the Standby member to any other host goes through the SYNC interface by default and what NAT rules should be removed, once this feature is active. Like in the sk167453 mentioned by G_W_Albrecht.
hi olavi,
thanks for your explanation...i read through and it is good to have an option there...
cheers
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 21 | |
| 20 | |
| 19 | |
| 8 | |
| 7 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Fri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Fri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY