- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
10 December @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Announcing Quantum R82.10!
Learn MoreOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hi, first time posting here. Apologies in advance for my limited english : )
So, we've been working with Checkpoint for years now, but since the 80.40 Jumbo 100 update applied a few days ago, the strangest bug happens.
At boot, the fwkern.conf file is being backup in a new file, copy_fwkern.conf, and a line added at the end of the custom fwkern.conf. But the addition is messed up, and If I reboot with this fwkern.conf, the gateway is stuck at loading.
So, I believe is was a problem due tu multiples updates on top of another. I re-done a gateway (we are in high availability cluster) from scratch, starting with the r80.40 iso, and then patching up to latest jumbo 100. No restore, no snapshot used. Same behaviour.
This is my fwkern.conf :
cphwd_nat_templates_support=1
cphwd_nat_templates_enabled=1
enhanced_ssl_inspection=0
bypass_on_enhanced_ssl_inspection=1
fwha_resend_arp_unicast=1
fwha_forw_packet_to_not_active=1
fwha_arp_forward_standby=1
after a reboot :
cphwd_nat_templates_support=1
cphwd_nat_templates_enabled=1
enhanced_ssl_inspection=0
bypass_on_enhanced_ssl_inspection=1
fwha_resend_arp_unicast=1
fwha_forw_packet_to_not_active=1
fwha_arp_forward_standby=1
nac_max_enforced_identities=90000
Doesn't matter if I put the file in read only, since it's regenerated at boot... Before opening a ticket, have you some stuff to look at ?
Thx 🙂
Florian -
I would open a TAC case regardless
Yes, I did too, I'm waiting for the support now. It's really strange. If I delete fwkern.conf, It comes back after a reboot, with the same nac_max_enforced_identities=90000 line only... So something is generating or adding this line to the file, but I really don't know what... Especially since it's doing the same thing on a "brand new" gateway too...
I don't have the entry in our systems but we are running JHFA91 at the moment.
We didn't have the problem with the Take 93. It's really since the Take 100... I'll let you know what the support says.
Great, have you also seen reduced CPU utilisation since applying JHFA100?
Also are you running Identity Awareness blade? Wondering if it has something to do with that parameter.
The parameter name suggests it's related to Identity Awareness.
I would open a TAC case.
As an emergency solution. You can also set the file with an "s" or "t" bit, then it can no longer be overwritten by the system:
chmod u+s fwkern.conf
The chmod command is also capable of changing the additional permissions or special modes of a file or directory. The symbolic modes use 's' to represent the setuid and setgid modes, and 't' to represent the sticky mode. The modes are only applied to the appropriate classes, regardless of whether or not other classes are specified.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 22 | |
| 19 | |
| 16 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 |
Fri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolFri 12 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Check Mates Live Netherlands: #41 AI & Multi Context ProtocolTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!About CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY