- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What's New in R82.10?
10 December @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Improve Your Security Posture with
Threat Prevention and Policy Insights
Overlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
I use the fw ctl fast_accel commands to bypass known data transfers from the blades as they spike the CPU. My issue is that the first time I made entries, I added /32 connections. When I realized I could only make 15 entries, I deleted them and added /24 entries. My problem is, about every 3-6 months, my CPU goes up, and when I check fast_accel, it has reverted back to my original /32 entries. When I open a ticket with TAC about this, they have no idea what to do.
Hey @Daniel_Westlund
If thats the case, there is obviously an issue they might not be aware of either. Did you ask them if case can be escalated further, so it can be checked what gives?
Best,
Andy
Yes. They are checking with R&D.
Personally, I never had this issue myself, though I only tested on R81.20. What version is this?
Andy
At least since R81. Maybe R80.30 sp. But it has survived into R81.10 and R81.20. To see the issue, you'd have to have deleted entries in the past. But it's weird so I wouldn't be surprised if it's rare.
Yeah, I gotcha. Just curious, was there ever any custom fix installed?
Andy
I meant custom fix on top of jumbo?
Not with this customer. Also, this is Maestor, but when I check the other SGs, they have the same entries as the SMO.
Not sure if that matters, but I will assume probably not. Anywho, keep us posted on what comes out of all this. Im super curious to know.
Andy
It looks like the configuration is stored in some files that can be monitored (and even restored): https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk156672
Curious if the timestamp on these files changes when this problem reoccurs as it might provide a clue.
Thank you. When you mention the files that could be monitored in that SK, I wonder if you mean $FWDIR/conf/fw_fast_accel_export_configuration? The entries there are the same as my current entries, so maybe if I delete that file and recreate from scratch it won't come back? Also, when I check the log file, it shows where I made the entries that are missing in the current state, so that's interesting. I suppose I could delete the export file, run delete_all, and then create new entries from scratch. I also don't think I entered "g_" when I entered my commands, although I do see the same show_table on the other SGs. But that would be worth a try as well.
For Maestro, you definitely have to do g_fw fast_accel.
Good file to know...was never aware of it before.
Andy
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 26 | |
| 18 | |
| 13 | |
| 8 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 |
Wed 26 Nov 2025 @ 12:00 PM (COT)
Panama City: Risk Management a la Parrilla: ERM, TEM & Meat LunchWed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasWed 03 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (COT)
Última Sesión del Año – CheckMates LATAM: ERM & TEM con ExpertosThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 02:00 PM (EST)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - AmericasWed 26 Nov 2025 @ 12:00 PM (COT)
Panama City: Risk Management a la Parrilla: ERM, TEM & Meat LunchAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY