- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
CheckMates Fifth Birthday
Celebrate with Us!
days
hours
minutes
seconds
Join the CHECKMATES Everywhere Competition
Submit your picture to win!
Check Point Proactive support
Free trial available for 90 Days!
As YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY
Upgrade to our latest GA Jumbo
The 2022 MITRE Engenuity ATT&CK®
Evaluations Results Are In!
Now Available: SmartAwareness Security Training
Training Built to Educate and Engage
MITRE ATT&CK
Inside Check Point products!
CheckFlix!
All Videos In One Space
Hello,
Looking for some design suggestion.
Here is the diagram should explain the scenario. In each FW I have 3 Interfaces, one is WAN and another 2 customer routes or Interfaces configured.
P1 Interface has Multiple Sub interface. Each of them is /30 subnet and Over /30 remote IP , customer subnets are routed.
Subnets Configured at P2 Port Sub Interface , is Connected Network. VRRP is configured on this Interfaces. It does not work but I am refreshing these 2 Current Firewall here I am Planning this VRRP to make it work.
I hope I am able to explain my scenario. In this scenario when some subnets are routed over P2P network and some are directly connected can I do Clustering ?
or I guess Clustering Considers Full Device right ? But wondering we can do clustering for Subinterfaces connected at P2 ONLY not for the Interfaces where over P2P Interface we routed some subnets. I do not think so still asking.
Or else If I want to keep it same setup as Some are VRRP and Some are Routed and Redistributed to OSPF , with the connectivity shown will it work ?
If you are employing VRRP to to perform Load Sharing (not balancing) between the members I'd say you'd be better off using the new Active-Active (NOT Load Sharing Unicast/Multicast) mode of ClusterXL introduced in R80.40.
@Timothy_Hall Thanks for your reply.
My question is if you look at P1 Interface ( Bigger Subnet routed over P2P Sub Interfaces ) and P2 Has Connected Subnets.
In this scenario, Can I do Clustering ?
If it does not I can only try VRRP for connected subnets.
What's the difference between Load Sharing and balancing ?
Are you able to see the diagram i attached. ?
If not all interfaces are clusterable I would move VRRP to the switches instead and use dynamic routing.
Routers / L3-switches likely have better integration between VRRP and dynamic routing protocols for particular route advertisement & failure scenarios.
If I move Networks to switch firewall filtering will not be possible right. thats why did not wanted to move vrrp to switches. What you think ?
And I should clarify that 2 FW are not at same site at 2 diff site in that case clustering does make sense ? on a shared WAN circuit ?
Apologies for not explaining fully.
You would likely also need to leverage VRFs here to seperate the VLANs at Layer-3 and force traffic via a transit interface to the FW to enforce inter-vlan segmentation, this may require a different/new license on some switch platforms.
About CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY