Hi,
I have a question that I've already asked to AI Copilot but maybe I need some confirmation.
In this moment I have a MGMT with "VSX Cluster A", 2 Cluster Members and 3 VS connected each other by a VSW.
I need to create, in the same MGMT, a second cluster "VSX Cluster B", w/ 2 Cluster members and 3 VS connected each other by a VSW.
The user data interfaces are going to be completely disconnected to avoid duplicated arp on network. The main goal is to migrate ClusterA to B just disconnecting user data interfaces from A and connecting B.
Here is the thing, ClusterB members are going to have different MGMT IP address than ClusterA, different name and different VSX internal network, but every ClusterB's virtual system needs to have the same interfaces ip addresses, routes and main address than the ClusterA ones have, just that instead of eth1, they are going to be all bonds.
So if ClusterA_VS1 main address: 192.168.11.10
eth1.3: 192.168.11.10
eth2.10: 192.168.10.1
eth3.111: 192.168.20.1
eth4.212: 192.168.30.1
ClusterA VIP MGMT: 10.10.10.1/24
ClusterA_Member1 MGMT: 10.10.10.2/24
ClusterA_Member2 MGMT: 10.10.10.3/24
Then ClusterB would be: main address: 192.168.11.10
bond0.3: 192.168.11.10
bond0.10: 192.168.10.1
bond1.111: 192.168.20.1
bond1.212: 192.168.30.1
ClusterB_Member1 MGMT: 10.10.10.11/24
ClusterB_Member2 MGMT: 10.10.10.12/24
ClusterB VIP MGMT: 10.10.10.10/24
Is this scenario posible?
I hope I'm being clear. Is basically replicate VSs configuration from ClusterA to ClusterB (not the mgmt/sync/internal network configuration/interfaces name).
I know that, when I install policy, mgmt sends them to the cluster members ip addresses and then its being sent to the relevant context. So I think policy installation wouldnt be a problem. Logs can be? VSX Management database could drive crazy w/ this?
Maybe im not seeing another problems that could happen or if the MGMT can say NO even before I start.
(I wish I could use VSNext, but IPv6 its a big You CAN'T in this moment).
Regards. David.