- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Security Gateways
- :
- SSH vulnerability detected, please verify.
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
SSH vulnerability detected, please verify.
I've been using Nmap vulners plugin for the past months and it seem to be pretty accurate, so I am a bit concerned with the results of today's scan of my lab network:
Nessus sees mostly nuisance vulnerabilities and does not complain about CVE-2006-5051:
The rating of 9.3 is listed here: NVD - CVE-2006-5051 it was modified on 10/10/2017.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The problem with most vulnerability scanners is they just say "On, you're running OpenSSH 4.3" and therefore must be vulnerable to this laundry list of CVEs without actually checking if it's a real issue or not.
Even though we're still running OpenSSH 4.3, we've patched the issue.
Refer to: Check Point response to OpenSSH vulnerabilities: CVE-2006-5051 and CVE-2006-4924
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Last update on CP in the link you have included is from 15-May-2014. The reclassification happen on 10/10/2017.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
NVD may have changed the classification for the problem in October 2017, but the underlying issue (and fix) is the same as it was back in 2006 when the issue was first discovered.
Thus there's nothing to update in the SK.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Very well. Can you delete this post?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
That being said, the statement is still valid, maybe SK date should simply be updated.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It sure did in the days I worked in the TAC
