PBR route vs connected route

[fjulianom]

Hi guys,

I know PBR takes precedence over the IP routing table. But does a PBR route have precedence over a connected route or only over static and routing protocols learned routes? Is this CP behaviour or standard behaviour?

Regards,

Julián

[Maarten_Sjouw]

Like any other route with a higher preference, it will take over when there is a smaller subnetmask. So when your interface has a /27 mask and you add 1 or 2 PBR routes with a /28 that overlaps the interface route it take the PBR.

[fjulianom]

Hi Maarten

But what happens when the connected route has /27 mask and the PBR route has /27 mask as well?

Regards,

Julián

[Maarten_Sjouw]

Then the interface route will take preference, it always has the highest priority.

[fjulianom]

Ok, last doubt, in this two cases:

1 - Static route with /27 mask and PBR route with /27 mask? Which will take precedence?

2 - Static route with /28 mask and PBR route with /27 mask? Which will take precedence?

Regards,

Julián

[Maarten_Sjouw]

1 - to my knowledge the PRB will take preference.

2 - easy the /28 will take preference over a /27 irrelevant here is the type of route. Smaller mask will always take preference over larger mask.

[fjulianom]

Hi Maarten,

It seems it has nothing to do with masks. PBR will take precedence over static and connected routes. Check this:

https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/Policy-Based-Routing-and-default-route-features/t...

It happened to me two days ago, PBR took precedence over my connected routes!

Regards,

Julián