- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Security Gateways
- :
- Re: MUH and Identity Collector
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
MUH and Identity Collector
Hi All,
I am running R81 gateways and have 2 Identity Collector Servers (version 81.035.0000). We have a bunch of remote locations which connect to us via vpn. These are behind an assortment of 1430 and 1530 devices. At these locations there are some kiosk type pc's for employees to log into, they are shared. These pc's can get a lot of different users on them as the employees sometimes change from fire station to firestation or from park to park. When we were using adquery I was able to set the MUH threshold to 25 which works well for us. In Identity Collector I can not find a place to do that (I actually can't find any customizing options like I could using adlogconfig for adquery). Does anyone know where I can find this threshold and change it from 7 to something else? These are not terminal servers, employees actually sign on, use it, then sign off one at a time thru the day.
Any help is GREATLY appreciated.
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello @Terri_Hawkins ,
I suggest you contact a Sales Engineer local to you. It is complicated (kind of impossible) supporting complex projects by writing.
If your use case is having 10 different users working on the same computer you need MUHv2 agent on it. This is the solution foreseen for this use case.
There are other potential solutions:
- have you thought about creating a logic using the ID Awareness API?
- are you planning integrating to a NAC solution such as Cisco ISE or any other solutions supporting RADIUS ACCOUNTING?
- would asking the users logging on the Captive Portal (Browser based authentication) be a potential solution?
As I said, you may want to brainstorm with a colleague local to you about this.
best regards
peter
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Terri_Hawkins „pdp conciliation idc_multiple_users enable“ will be you‘re needed command.
see @Peter_Elmer nice video Identity Awareness - Multiple users working on one machine
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello @Terri_Hawkins ,
you find guidelines about ID Collector scalable deployment in sk179544. Take your time walking through the material.
best regards
peter
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you so much for the link. I watched the video and it is very helpful. However, I am unsure if this will fix the issue. If I have 10 people signing in will changing the pdp concil idc to "enable" allow me to bypass the threshold of 7 for MUH? I read the default threshold is 7, and what we are seeing in our environment is when the 8th person signs in their PC is marked as muh. The traffic in the logs show the ip of the pc but no user attached to it. Since all of our rules are based on user there is no internet for them. Your thoughts are appreciated.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hello @Terri_Hawkins ,
I suggest you contact a Sales Engineer local to you. It is complicated (kind of impossible) supporting complex projects by writing.
If your use case is having 10 different users working on the same computer you need MUHv2 agent on it. This is the solution foreseen for this use case.
There are other potential solutions:
- have you thought about creating a logic using the ID Awareness API?
- are you planning integrating to a NAC solution such as Cisco ISE or any other solutions supporting RADIUS ACCOUNTING?
- would asking the users logging on the Captive Portal (Browser based authentication) be a potential solution?
As I said, you may want to brainstorm with a colleague local to you about this.
best regards
peter
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks so much! We are going to do the Captive Portal and put agents on the kiosk pc's, but in the meantime we took your advise and contacted our Sales Engineer and he gave us the article we were looking for. There were two of us searching like crazy and could not find it but there it is. We will be implementing this shortly and hopefully it will work well enough to get us thru the short run until we can do the agents/portal.
thanks again! Terri
Solution Title: How to increase the threshold for multiuser host (MUH) for Identity Collector associations?
Solution ID: sk136652
Solution Link:
