- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
AI Security Masters E7:
How CPR Broke ChatGPT's Isolation and What It Means for You
Blueprint Architecture for Securing
The AI Factory & AI Data Center
Call For Papers
Your Expertise. Our Stage
Good, Better, Best:
Prioritizing Defenses Against Credential Abuse
Ink Dragon: A Major Nation-State Campaign
Watch HereCheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
I am a little bit confused about the statement that Lightspeed applications do not support VSX.
Currently, a VSX license for 5 virtual systems is included in the base license.
Therefore my question:
1) Can we use VSX on a QLS appliance using only the 8 x 10Gbps ports (without using the NVIDIA interfaces)?
2) When will be VSX regularly supported? With R81.20?
3) Why are 5 VSX licenses included in the base license if VSX is not supported?
Is there a statement from Check Point here?
1) Not supported at this time.
2) Correct - starting R81.20, only when a VS is connected to physical interfaces on the same SmartNIC.
3) As above the support is planned for the near term.
As @_Val_ mentioned in another thread please stay tuned for the webinars and documentation updates.
Good day @Chris_Atkinson,
Do you know if this is still the case that, it is not supported using QLS and VSX?
br
Jørgen
You can see the current state of support here: https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk179432
Hello,
you answered that lightspeed is supported under VSX with R81.20. The documentation in https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/Appliances/100G_Ports_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-100G-Card-AG/Kn... does also mention that it is supported on R81.20.
But now I got the answer from TAC and CISSP that it is not supported.
The document phoneboy linked on the other hand says it is not supported (when you look at the small hook in the table, that you only see when you read this datasheet word by word).
So the documentation and your post are contradictory.
Regards,
Jan
VSNext is not supported, VSX (traditional) is per the table in the link provided.
Be careful not to confuse Maestro or ElasticXL applications here.
Hello,
this is the actual information we got from RnD and product management:
Regards,
Jan
Note sk79700 also states VSX support for UPPAK without caveats.
Where the support differs from that which I described above i.e. mapping a physical interface to a VS I will request the specific limitations be documented accordingly (if not already in progress).
Hopefully change it is in progress. The information in the datasheets are false and misleading. Even TAC members, SE and professional services guys don't realy know what's correct. We purchased these cards on the assumption that this function is implemented.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 66 | |
| 19 | |
| 13 | |
| 12 | |
| 11 | |
| 9 | |
| 9 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 |
Tue 28 Apr 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood: Securing your GenAI-enabled Web Applications with Check Point WAFThu 30 Apr 2026 @ 03:00 PM (PDT)
Hillsboro, OR: Securing The AI Transformation and Exposure ManagementTue 28 Apr 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood: Securing your GenAI-enabled Web Applications with Check Point WAFTue 12 May 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall delivered as a serviceThu 30 Apr 2026 @ 03:00 PM (PDT)
Hillsboro, OR: Securing The AI Transformation and Exposure ManagementAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY