- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Security Gateways
- :
- Re: Does anyone have tried to bonding interface ch...
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Does anyone have tried to bonding interface checkpoint security gateway with mode LACP
Hi All,
i have concern to implementation LACP on Security Gateway.
the concern is should i must set target of bonding interface security gateway has applied LACP or no?
example:
there is one cluster with 2 member:
let's say FW1 and FW2, under this cluster there is an IPS dedicated with HA.
If FW1 has bonding eth3 - eth4 and another side FW2 has bonding same interface like FW1.
The question is, should i must set LACP on Mcafee or if Mcafee don't support LACP, can i use switch to receive interface LACP from cluster checkpoint and then from switch go to Mcafee1 and 2.
Hopefully my explanation is clear, if not i will send that topology.
Note: i have tried this mode between 6800 appliance series with standalone configuration and connected to 1800 appliance quantum spark, two this appliance has applied LACP configuration.
Thanks Regards
Dio Aditya Pradana
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
LACP is common for load-sharing type Bonds (amongst other available modes) but you should align the configuration with what the adjacent device supports/expects
Refer:
