- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Policy Insights and Policy Auditor in Action
19 November @ 5pm CET / 11am ET
Access Control and Threat Prevention Best Practices
Watch HereOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hello,
We have recent setup our 3920 gateways with R82.10. I am facing issue with 2nd Gateway not coming up , it's show down.
when i check with error massage it's show Bond1 interface is down, but physical when i login Gaia it's show up.
We are using Aruba 6300M switches to connect Firewall where Aruba Switches are running on VSF configuration with Lag.
i have attached snap for the bond1 configuration, cphaprob stat output, also Aruba Switch configuration snap.
Which JHF take is this machine deployed with and what is the output of "cphaprob -a if" ?
Hello
FW01> cpinfo -y all
This is Check Point CPinfo Build 914000219 for GAIA
[CPshared]
No hotfixes..
[IDA]
No hotfixes..
[CPFC]
No hotfixes..
[MGMT]
No hotfixes..
[FW1]
HOTFIX_PUBLIC_CLOUD_CA_BUNDLE_AUTOUPDATE
HOTFIX_INEXT_NANO_EGG_AUTOUPDATE
HOTFIX_GOT_TPCONF_AUTOUPDATE
FW1 build number:
This is Check Point's software version R82.10 - Build 407
kernel: R82.10 - Build 422
[SecurePlatform]
No hotfixes..
[CPinfo]
No hotfixes..
[PPACK]
No hotfixes..
[AutoUpdater]
HOTFIX_INFRA_CONFIG_AUTOUPDATE
[DIAG]
No hotfixes..
[CVPN]
No hotfixes..
[cpsdc_wrapper]
HOTFIX_CPSDC_AUTOUPDATE
[CPUpdates]
BUNDLE_PUBLIC_CLOUD_CA_BUNDLE_AUTOUPDATE Take: 21
BUNDLE_CPOTLPAGENT_AUTOUPDATE Take: 131
BUNDLE_CPOTELCOL_AUTOUPDATE Take: 210
BUNDLE_INEXT_NANO_EGG_AUTOUPDATE Take: 38
BUNDLE_CPVIEWEXPORTER_AUTOUPDATE Take: 75
BUNDLE_QUID_AUTOUPDATE Take: 53
BUNDLE_HCP_AUTOUPDATE Take: 88
BUNDLE_INFRA_CONFIG_AUTOUPDATE Take: 10
BUNDLE_GOT_TPCONF_AUTOUPDATE Take: 158
BUNDLE_CPSDC_AUTOUPDATE Take: 40
[hcp_wrapper]
HOTFIX_HCP_AUTOUPDATE
[CPquid]
HOTFIX_QUID_AUTOUPDATE
[CPviewExporter]
HOTFIX_OTLP_GA
[CPotelcol]
HOTFIX_OTLP_GA
[CPotlpAgent]
HOTFIX_OTLP_GA
FW01> cphaprob -a if
CCP mode: Manual (Unicast)
Required interfaces: 3
Required secured interfaces: 1
Interface Name: Status:
Mgmt Non-Monitored
eth1 UP
eth8 (S) UP
bond1 (LS-P) UP
maas_tunnel Non-Monitored
S - sync, HA/LS - bond type, LM - link monitor, P - probing
Virtual cluster interfaces: 2
eth1 50.200.58.244
bond1 192.20.15.5
FW01>
FW02 output-----
FW02> cphaprob -a if
CCP mode: Manual (Unicast)
Required interfaces: 2
Required secured interfaces: 1
Interface Name: Status:
Mgmt Non-Monitored
eth1 UP
eth8 (S) UP
bond1 (LS-P) DOWN (61634.2 secs)
maas_tunnel Non-Monitored
S - sync, HA/LS - bond type, LM - link monitor, P - probing
Virtual cluster interfaces: 2
eth1 50.200.58.244
bond1 192.20.15.5
FW02>
Is the cabling correct to the switch, have you investigated the lacp-block ?
cabling has been done as below
FW01- port 3 to core01 23
FW01 - port 4 to core02 23
FW02 - port 3 to core01 24
FW02 - port 4 to core02 24
It seems like all 4 ports are in the same LAG on the switch site? Should be separate LAGs per gateway.
Might be, I have asked my vendor to check from Aruba switched end.
is there anything to check from checkpoint side
In your screenshots, shows Mgmt interface is down, not bond.
I dont see bond anywhere. hey, do you allow remote? Im just doing some lab work now, but dont start till later, so happy to try help you.
Hey guys,
Just to update, Vikas and I had zoom remote and below are my notes from it. @VIKAS1 , I would certainly check Aruba switch end, as config is 100% correct on CP side.
*************************************
-new 3920 cluster on R82.10
-managed by smart-1 cloud
-in sv monitor, shows bond interface is down
checked cphaprob -a if
this did work fine before, just started today
Aruba switch appears fine
ran cphastop and cphastart on affected member fw02
we also bounced the interface, verified topology, same issue, still shows down from cphaprob state
rebooted fw02 member
verified -> same state, shows as down and bond is down as well
to me, this definitely appears to be Aruba switch related, as config is the same on both members, including bond interface
Hey Vikas,
I did some more lab tests on this and when I had topology set the way you did, I had exact same problem. I then changed it to setting per routing (cant recall the exact name now, but its 2nd last option I believe) and then all worked when I installed policy.
@VIKAS1 This is the setting I meant. BUT, please be careful, better try this in short maintenance window.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 24 | |
| 18 | |
| 15 | |
| 13 | |
| 12 | |
| 10 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 4 |
Wed 19 Nov 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EST)
TechTalk: Improve Your Security Posture with Threat Prevention and Policy InsightsThu 20 Nov 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - AMERThu 20 Nov 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CST)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - EMEAWed 26 Nov 2025 @ 12:00 PM (COT)
Panama City: Risk Management a la Parrilla: ERM, TEM & Meat LunchWed 19 Nov 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EST)
TechTalk: Improve Your Security Posture with Threat Prevention and Policy InsightsThu 20 Nov 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - AMERThu 20 Nov 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CST)
Hacking LLM Applications: latest research and insights from our LLM pen testing projects - EMEAThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 12:30 PM (SGT)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - APACThu 04 Dec 2025 @ 03:00 PM (CET)
End-of-Year Event: Securing AI Transformation in a Hyperconnected World - EMEAWed 26 Nov 2025 @ 12:00 PM (COT)
Panama City: Risk Management a la Parrilla: ERM, TEM & Meat LunchAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY