Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
zhangchuang
Contributor
Jump to solution

BGP routing information The status of the route is Hidden and Rank:N/A

Hello fellow Check Mates, 

The customer configures the following configurations on the peer BGP:

bgp 65015

graceful-restart

peer 172.16.40.78 as-number 65115

peer 172.16.40.78 bfd min-tx-interval 300 min-rx-interval 300

peer 172.16.40.78 bfd enable

peer 172.16.70.78 as-number 65500

peer 172.16.70.78 bfd min-tx-interval 300 min-rx-interval 300

peer 172.16.70.78 bfd enable

peer 198.19.210.85 as-number 18084

peer 198.19.210.85 bfd min-tx-interval 300 min-rx-interval 300

peer 198.19.210.85 bfd enable

#

ipv4-family unicast

  undo synchronization

  import-route direct

  import-route static

  peer 172.16.40.78 enable               

  peer 172.16.40.78 route-policy MAP-CX-IN import

  peer 172.16.70.78 enable

  peer 172.16.70.78 route-policy AS-PATH import

  peer 172.16.70.78 route-policy AS-PATH export

  peer 198.19.210.85 enable

#

route-policy AS-PATH permit node 10

if-match ip-prefix AS-PATH

apply as-path 65500 65500 65500 65500 65500 65500 65500 65500 65500 65500 additive

#

ip ip-prefix AS-PATH index 10 permit 192.168.99.0 24

ip ip-prefix AS-PATH index 20 permit 10.7.0.0 19

 

After A Route-policy is added, the status of the route received by the checkpoint firewall is displayed as Hidden and Rank:N/A

The BGP configurations of the checkpoint firewall are as follows:

set bgp external remote-as 65015 on

set bgp external remote-as 65015 peer 172.16.70.65 on

set bgp external remote-as 65015 peer 172.16.70.65 ping on

set bgp external remote-as 65025 on

set bgp external remote-as 65025 peer 172.16.80.65 on

set bgp external remote-as 65025 peer 172.16.80.65 ping on

0015.png

Please help to analyze the cause of this, thank you!

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
Chris_Atkinson
Employee Employee
Employee

Local AS and the as-path prepend are the same value, if I recall correctly this would break BGP rules.

If this is absolutely necessary you may need to look at the allow-as-in-count feature to "bend" loop prevention. 

CCSM R77/R80/ELITE

View solution in original post

6 Replies
Chris_Atkinson
Employee Employee
Employee

Local AS and the as-path prepend are the same value, if I recall correctly this would break BGP rules.

If this is absolutely necessary you may need to look at the allow-as-in-count feature to "bend" loop prevention. 

CCSM R77/R80/ELITE
Blason_R
Leader
Leader

Or as-override to accept that as a route else @Chris_Atkinson said it will not install the route in route table. Though you can see in received route

Thanks and Regards,
Blason R
CCSA,CCSE,CCCS
zhangchuang
Contributor

If I change the value of the AS path prefix, can I solve this problem?

Blason_R
Leader
Leader

Nope it won't I believe - This is what you are receiving the routes correct? I guess you will have to use as-override 

e.g. - In my scenario

set bgp external remote-as 65001 peer 192.168.203.153 allowas-in-count 5

Where my BGP AS and remote BGP AS was same and we had a carrier in between which was not overriding the AS hence I had to do it on firewall

Thanks and Regards,
Blason R
CCSA,CCSE,CCCS
Chris_Atkinson
Employee Employee
Employee

Probably the as-path needs to be changed yes (to the remote-as) or better use a different method altogether such as local preference/med etc.

Usually you would only prepend your own AS number on outbound route advertisements. 

CCSM R77/R80/ELITE
zhangchuang
Contributor

I now ask the BGP on the opposite side to change the AS path prefix. At present, normal routes can be obtained. Thank you for your support.00001.png

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events