Any issues with 9100 gateways running R81.20?

[D_TK]

Hi everyone.

I have a bunch of 5xxx clusters that i need to forklift this summer.  I was hoping to run R82 on them right out of the gate, but with it not being "recommended" yet, it looks like i'm going to provision them on r81.20.

Anecdotally, i recall seeing some checkmates posts over the last 6 months or so regarding the 9100/R81.20 combination - can anyone who's running this combination speak to any ongoing issues, gotchas, or workarounds needed.

Many thanks.

EDIT - changed my typos from R81.10 to the correct R81.20...

[Chris_Atkinson]

The 9100 is supported only with R81.20 or higher, not R81.10.

[D_TK]

yep, that's actually what i meant to type....twice.  all of my gateways run R81.20, and management is R82.  Any known issues with 9100 gateways and R81.20?

[the_rock · Accepted solution]

I work with 3 customers who have those with R81.20 and also using https inspection, had not heard of any issues. They all are super happy with them.

Andy

[Chris_Atkinson · Accepted solution]

Shouldn't be an issue. Early on some customers reportedly had to tweak the SecureXL mode but i believe that has settled some as newer JHF were released. 

[Mattias_Jansson]

We have been running 9100 on R81.20 take 99 for a month now in production (urlf, applc, ips, antibot, antivirus, https inspection).
The performance is better then I expected and no issues so far.

[Alex-]

A few 9100/9200 with Take 99, running fine for now. Don't go below 99 however, there are important issues solved in that Take.

[the_rock]

Exactly...plus. it is recommended take.

Andy