- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Quantum Spark Management Unleashed!
Introducing Check Point Quantum Spark 2500:
Smarter Security, Faster Connectivity, and Simpler MSP Management!
Check Point Named Leader
2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Hybrid Mesh Firewall
HTTPS Inspection
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
SharePoint CVEs and More!
Hello,
I need to configure VIP on different subnet on a SMB cluster - centrally managed - on WAN link (have not enought pub. IPs and Mgmt is directly connected).
So private IPs for the interfaces and a public IP as VIP. Problem is to set the default gateway - SMB Internet connection only allows configure Gateway in the same subnet. Adding a manual default route is also no possible.
Any idea?
sk159772 suggests this should be possible in R81.10.x
Ask TAC - https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/R81.10/WebAdminGuides/EN/CP_R81.10_ClusterXL_AdminGuide/Topics-... could apply.
sk159772 suggests this should be possible in R81.10.x
ID | Description | Found In | Resolved In |
01615874 | When defining a locally managed cluster, the Virtual IP address of a clustered interface has to be in the same subnet as the real IP addresses of the cluster members. | R80.20 GA | R81.10.00 |
I use centrally managed - but actually as said I heve no idea how to configure the default gateway.
Hi!
Are you trying to configure DG before or after cluster configuration?
As far as I know, DG could be configured in subnet, other than actual IP address, only when cluster configuration already done on the appliance.
Means - try to configure cluster first (with all needed IPs), install policies, and only after that - change DG on members themselves.
cluster is configured - actually the issue is in configuring the default route on gaia embedded itself!
Have you tried R81.10.05 ?
for some reason my last post was deleted with the screensot of the issue.
Did you contact TAC already ?
I pushed issue to Checkpoint SE .....will post the solution here if I get one
Hello @dede79 ,
We are facing a similar scenario, need to have member interfaces in a different subnet than virtual IP. Were you able to make it work? was default route possible?
Regards
Have you tested R81.10.07 (996001430) out of interest?
Successfully tested this to the extent my lab allows on a locally managed cluster running R81.10.07 (996001430).
Time permitting will follow-up similar tests on a centrally managed variant also.
Hi @dede79
Were you able to solve the problem with the default routes? I have the same scenario and same problem.
Could you help me? thanks
Please open a case with TAC if not already and I will follow up internally, thanks.
Share the SR number with me in private message.
Hi,
I would also like to know if there is a supported solution for centrally managed SPARK cluster with a Cluster IP Address on different subnets on the WAN interface. Could you share the solution please?
Kind Regards,
Jones
sk182234 claims that such a solution is possible for both Locally and Centrally Managed Clusters.
The feature "Single routable IP" for clusters is supported starting from the R81.10.05 release.
For Locally Managed appliances, see the R81.10.X Locally Managed Administration Guide topic "Configuring High Availability" section "Single Routable IP Cluster."
For Centrally Managed appliances, see the R81.10.X Centrally Managed Administration Guide topic "Configuring High Availability" section "Configuring a Single Routable IP Cluster in Central Management."
Example diagram:
Even if there a section in documentation about the configuration of Single Routable IP (https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/SMB_R81.10.X/AdminGuides_Centrally_Managed/EN/Content/Topics/Co...) as described in https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/SMB-Gateways-Spark/Implementing-High-Availability-Firewall-Clust... I recently close a ticket with TAC and they say that there is no way to do this configuration with Spark Appliances in Centrally Managed mode.
I suggest to you the "local transport network" between gateway and router
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
User | Count |
---|---|
11 | |
8 | |
4 | |
4 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 |
Wed 10 Sep 2025 @ 11:00 AM (CEST)
Effortless Web Application & API Security with AI-Powered WAF, an intro to CloudGuard WAFWed 10 Sep 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Quantum Spark Management Unleashed: Hands-On TechTalk for MSPs Managing SMB NetworksFri 12 Sep 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 38: Harmony Email & CollaborationWed 10 Sep 2025 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
Quantum Spark Management Unleashed: Hands-On TechTalk for MSPs Managing SMB NetworksFri 12 Sep 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 38: Harmony Email & CollaborationAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY