Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
kristait
Participant

Issue with Azure AD Authentication for Remote Access VPN after R81.10.15 Upgrade

Hello everyone,

I recently upgraded our Check Point SMB 1800 firewall to the latest firmware version, R81.10.15. One of the new features introduced in this release is the ability to authenticate VPN users via Azure AD (SAML), which I was excited to configure for our environment.

Steps Taken:

  1. I followed the instructions provided in the Check Point documentation.
  2. Created a new Enterprise Application on Azure AD to enable VPN authentication for users using their Azure AD accounts.
  3. After configuration, I tested the application using the "Test Sign-in" feature on the Azure portal. The test was successful, and Microsoft Entra ID issued a SAML token to the service provider (Check Point firewall).

Issue:

However, when I attempt to connect to the VPN using Check Point Endpoint Security, the connection fails. Attached is a screenshot showing the error messages during the connection attempt.

  • The VPN client hangs during the connection process, and I receive a "Can't reach this page" message for the authentication step.
  • The logs indicate that the VPN client is trying to authenticate but does not seem to proceed beyond that.

What I've Verified:

  • Azure AD SAML authentication appears to be configured correctly based on the successful test sign-in from the Azure portal.
  • The firewall settings are configured as per the Check Point guide for SAML-based authentication.
  • I can confirm that the firewall upgrade to R81.10.15 was successful, and all other firewall features seem to be working as expected.

Request for Assistance:

Has anyone else encountered this issue with Azure AD SAML authentication for remote access VPN after upgrading to R81.10.15? If so, could you share any insights or troubleshooting steps that might help resolve this problem?

Additionally, are there specific logs or debugging steps on the Check Point firewall side that could shed light on why the SAML authentication isn't proceeding during the VPN connection?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks in advance for your assistance.

Environment:

  • Check Point SMB 1800 firewall (R81.10.15)
  • Azure AD for SAML authentication
  • Check Point Endpoint Security VPN Client

kristait_0-1727610719707.png

 

0 Kudos
15 Replies
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

Based on what I know about SAML, the client has to be able to reach a URL on the gateway to perform the authentication.
I assume this is in Step 7: the Unique identifier URL value from the Quantum Spark Gateway WebUI.
Does this URL reflect an FQDN, IP address, or?
Can you confirm in a web browser this loads any page?

0 Kudos
kristait
Participant

@PhoneBoy :

  • The Unique identifier URL is currently set to reflect my primary ISP’s public IP in the format https://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.
  • When I attempt to load the URL in a web browser, I get the "Can't reach this page" error.
  • We are not using DDNS on our appliance, so I assume this might be causing issues when the IP address is used instead of an FQDN. Would changing this to an FQDN (by setting up DDNS) help in this case?
0 Kudos
G_W_Albrecht
Legend Legend
Legend

Better open a SR# with CP TAC!

CCSE / CCTE / CTPS / CCME / CCSM Elite / SMB Specialist
Dafna
Employee
Employee

Hi,

Could you please check if there are any relevant logs on the security logs page? Also, are you using an NTP server?

0 Kudos
kristait
Participant

@Dafna :

  • We're using the default Check Point NTP server settings, and the time is synced correctly on the gateway.
  • I checked the security logs, and this is what I found:
    • "10.xx.0.xxx (local IP) xxx.xx.xx.xxx (public IP) CP_SmartPortal 2 Accepted on rule 2 (Incoming/Internal Default Policy)."
  • It appears that something is being accepted via CP_SmartPortal, but I’m unsure if this is related to the SAML authentication process. Could this log entry indicate an incomplete or incorrect configuration?
0 Kudos
the_rock
Legend
Legend

I totally see what Phoneboy is saying, but it might be worth to confirm with TAC if its related to the version you upgraded to. To me, logically, if this worked BEFORE the upgrade, and no config was changed, most likely may have to do with the upgrade...just my logical reasoning.

Andy

0 Kudos
Chris_Atkinson
Employee Employee
Employee

It was a new capability introduced with this GW version.

With that said it's also worth confirming the Endpoint client version used for correlation purposes?

CCSM R77/R80/ELITE
0 Kudos
kristait
Participant

  1. @Chris_Atkinson :

    • We have downloaded and installed the latest version of the Endpoint client, which is E86.80_CheckPointVPN.
0 Kudos
Chris_Atkinson
Employee Employee
Employee

Actually the latest client version is E88.x

CCSM R77/R80/ELITE
0 Kudos
kristait
Participant

We have installed the latest version of the client, E88.40. I've now noticed that the page redirects through the browser (whereas earlier it would open in a small window), but I still receive the same error:

"Hmmm… can't reach this page. xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx refused to connect."


It seems that the firewall may be blocking the SAML VPN connection, though I’m unsure which specific service or rule needs to be enabled to resolve this issue.

kristait_0-1727688282132.png

 

 

0 Kudos
jurgenvrieze
Participant

I had this issue with an EA version of R81.10.15. upload of the metadatafile seemed OK, but it wasn't. There is no real message something went wrong. 

Can you check if the metadata was imported and installed correctly? there should be a green mark (or 2)

 

0 Kudos
kristait
Participant

@the_rock :

  • Thanks for pointing that out! Just to clarify, we're using an SMB 1800 locally managed Firewall, and this is the first time we’re setting up the new SAML authentication capability introduced with R81.10.15.
  • So this isn’t an issue with a pre-existing configuration breaking after the upgrade—it’s just that the feature isn’t fully working after the first-time setup.
0 Kudos
the_rock
Legend
Legend

Got it. I would still open TAC case to investigate.

0 Kudos
kristait
Participant

@the_rock, I have created a TAC case, and the number is SR# 6-0004074266.

the_rock
Legend
Legend

Sounds good, keep us posted.

Andy

0 Kudos

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events