- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
AI Security Masters E7:
How CPR Broke ChatGPT's Isolation and What It Means for You
Blueprint Architecture for Securing
The AI Factory & AI Data Center
Call For Papers
Your Expertise. Our Stage
Good, Better, Best:
Prioritizing Defenses Against Credential Abuse
Ink Dragon: A Major Nation-State Campaign
Watch HereCheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
790 WiFi appliance is in production with two Internet connections, and multiple defined objects and rules, local switch is defined and two WiFi segments, one guest and one with access to LAN.
I was advised to: 1) backup the existing 790 2) confirm both units have same firmware 3) flatten existing unit retaining existing firmware version 4) setup first unit as Primary HA 5) setup second unit as HA, 6) restore backup to newly created cluster to retain objects and rules.
When I restored the backup to the cluster, it brought back the objects and rules, but overwrote the cluster configuration and would not operate normally until the second unit was taken off line.
Question: Can I configure cluster from the existing device (with its rules and objects in place) by simply adding the second unit, or must I flatten the existing unit, create the cluster with both "bare" units, then recreate the objects and rules?
No need to reset configuration on primary unit. You only need to complete First Time Configuration Wizard on secondary one (disable switch on LAN ports btw). Then connect sync cable. Proceed with configuring cluster on primary and then on secondary unit.
Make sure both units run the same firmware version.
Thanks for your input. When choosing "Configure Cluster" from High Availability, the device would not respond. After an hour with TAC and no solution, I'll start from scratch configuring the new 790 as primary, install Internet connections, objects, and rules, then configure it as the primary cluster member.
That's unfortunate to hear. There must be something really wrong to behave like that. Let us know what the outcome is.
Happy to hear it. Although it could have been nice to find what the problem is. May be something in the local database was not right.
Interestingly, this morning the client called and reported Internet access was (mostly) down as well as email flow to and from their internally hosted mail server. The Sand Blast Threat Emulation. which would not activate yesterday, was now active, and apparently was causing problems, as traffic returned to normal when the Threat Emulation was turned off.
In addition, the WiFi configurations had changed; the Guest WiFi that was configured yesterday was inactive, its access policy had changed to allow access to the local network, its interface configuration had changed, and the additional (Standard) WiFi that was created for LAN users access yesterday, was nowhere to be found.
I would start with checking /var/log/messages and /var/log/log/sfwd.elg. Also it is worth checking 'dmesg'. And look for possible *core* and *panic* files in /logs.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 | |
| 1 |
Tue 28 Apr 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood: Securing your GenAI-enabled Web Applications with Check Point WAFThu 30 Apr 2026 @ 03:00 PM (PDT)
Hillsboro, OR: Securing The AI Transformation and Exposure ManagementTue 28 Apr 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
Under the Hood: Securing your GenAI-enabled Web Applications with Check Point WAFTue 12 May 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall delivered as a serviceThu 30 Apr 2026 @ 03:00 PM (PDT)
Hillsboro, OR: Securing The AI Transformation and Exposure ManagementAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY