I can't imagine this will work very well, and it's not necessarily because of the encryption domain + route-based VPN setting.
The issue I see is using the same IP in two different objects and having different VPN settings for both gateways.
I can't see anything good coming from this.
That said, it's not very clear what your end game is here.
Is it to replace the 1100 configured with a domain-based VPN with the 3100 configured with a route-based VPN or something else?
Please be as explicit as possible.