- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Management
- :
- Re: Policy and multiple layers behavior
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Policy and multiple layers behavior
Hello
could you please guide me understanding how rule base checks are done with different layers?
for example i have one policy with 3 layers, 2 layers are shared. when the incoming connection comes will this mean it will first for thru first layer then second and third then get dropped or the first drop rule hit?
thank you
ismar
Accepted Solutions
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
see this guide for clarity Layers in R80
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
see this guide for clarity Layers in R80
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
thank you great help
could you direct me to more detail explanation when defining Ordered layers?
do we only need clean up rule in last layer?
thank you
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Please see the following guides for:
- best practices for layers in Pre-R80 GW's: How do I create an Access Policy for Pre-R80 GWs?
- examples of ordered layers and how the enforcement works: https://community.checkpoint.com/message/1334#comment-1334
Regarding cleanup rules:
You don't have to define clean up rules explicitly. Each layer has an implicit cleanup rule - either any any accept, or any any drop.
In R7x SmartDashboard we had this generalized - implicit any any drop for the Firewall policy and implicit any any accept for the Application Control policy.
You can control the implicit cleanup rule when you edit a layer and go the the "Advanced" page:
Although it's usually a good best practice to create that cleanup rule explicitly on the rulebase.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
And last thing from my on this topic, is it possibly to have 2 Firewall layers in one Policy?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Only for R80.10 GW's and above. Having more than 1 ordered layer for Firewall for pre-R80 GW's will fail policy installation.
Let me know if you have other questions for layers in R80. Other than the discussions that I've linked so far, you can also check the admin guide for general recommendations.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Is this also same for Inline Layer?
When will R80 be available for GW's?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Yes, inline layers have the same editor, and they have the same settings for the implicit cleanup rule.
Using inline layers requires an R80.10 GW, but because R80.10 will be a minor release, the Security Management server and SmartConsole applications are already prepared for designing this type of policies.
For R80.10 release date it is best to follow the Check Point Release Plan.
