- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- Quantum
- :
- Management
- :
- Re: Move Reject action in rulebase
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Move Reject action in rulebase
When working with rulebases that are assigned to internal zone firewalls (not exposed directly to the internet) it makes sense to use action reject in stead of drop.
R80.10 has moved reject from directly accessible in the dropdown on the action column to the more... menu. This makes working with new rules harder.
I would like you to either move this option back permanently or on a preference basis.
Now I either have to copy a template/existing rule with reject or use the api when I want to add multiple reject rules as a work around. This is not very user friendly, it worked well in R77.30 SmartDashboard. Why change it for changes sake?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This rather sounds like a RFE - tell CP about it here:
Products and Feature Suggestions
Note the RFE Number and hand it to your local SE to get more support for it.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
While we still support using Reject as an action, it's generally not Best Practice to do so.
I suppose by moving it to a "More" menu, we are encouraging this Best Practice more directly
In any case, it's good feedback.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
In the OP I explained the rationale on why we use reject in stead of drop. When Check Point creates best practices you do not take into account a lot of issues that occur in datacenters with legacy applications.
So my request is valid, please take this into account.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I didn't say your request was not valid.
In fact, I even said it was good feedback
I was merely explaining the rationale.
We can certainly consider it for a later release.
An RFE like Guenther suggested probably wouldn't hurt.
