Hi, all.
I'm working on a method of identifying unused NAT rules and eliminating them. FW rules are easy enough because the have hit counters. NAT rules currently do not.
I know hit count for NAT rules is supported in R81, but the customer is looking for a workaround in current architecture (R80.40).
I can imagine that it may be possible to use API calls to dump both rulebases and compare the objects in each to find which are mutually exclusive. Then we would understand which objects are used in the NAT rulebase and not in the FW rulebase.
Has anybody successfully achieved the above scenario? If so, could you share your methodology with me?
Thanks,
Noah G