- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
The Great Exposure Reset
24 February 2026 @ 5pm CET / 11am EST
CheckMates Fest 2026
Watch Now!AI Security Masters
Hacking with AI: The Dark Side of Innovation
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
Hi,
This is a screenshot from an Application log which shows me two different usernames.

Marked with orange and number 1 have the same username. Marked with blue is a different username. Why is destination user name different from the User field?
Because user b logged in to the database server (on the windows system) and the IP of the server was associated with this user.
A session from user a only shows this information as this information was not deleted (has not timed out).
Destination Username is the one associated to destination IP.
Associated in which way? Can you explain more please.
By identity awareness depending on your configuration. I assume ADquery or IDC.
I understand that. But if user a access a MS-SQL database, why is a different user b shown on destination username?
Because user b logged in to the database server (on the windows system) and the IP of the server was associated with this user.
A session from user a only shows this information as this information was not deleted (has not timed out).
Thanks for explaining. Since this was a correlated log showing user a accessing a database I don't see the point in this log of having the information about user b that is associated with that server. Do you?
I wouldn't need this information, but better have an information I don't need, than omitting it 🙂
Btw. if you don't need identity awareness on your servers (as source), you could exclude the server networks generally from IDC or ADquery.
While I usually see omitting data as a bad thing, in this case I was misled by the wording "Destination User Name". In my experience, some logs look like user a is a compromised account that's trying to access the system at the IP that user b is associated to. I'll be updating my team and any others that ask about that feature. Maybe a name change on those fields can be considered? Also "Dst User Dn"
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 57 | |
| 43 | |
| 15 | |
| 14 | |
| 14 | |
| 11 | |
| 11 | |
| 10 | |
| 9 | |
| 8 |
Thu 12 Feb 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
AI Security Masters Session 3: AI-Generated Malware - From Experimentation to Operational RealityFri 13 Feb 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 43: Terugblik op de Check Point Sales Kick Off 2026Thu 19 Feb 2026 @ 03:00 PM (EST)
Americas Deep Dive: Check Point Management API Best PracticesThu 12 Feb 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
AI Security Masters Session 3: AI-Generated Malware - From Experimentation to Operational RealityFri 13 Feb 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
CheckMates Live Netherlands - Sessie 43: Terugblik op de Check Point Sales Kick Off 2026Thu 19 Feb 2026 @ 03:00 PM (EST)
Americas Deep Dive: Check Point Management API Best PracticesAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY