- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Maestro Masters
Round Table session with Maestro experts
Hello, I have one group with two 6700 gateways and learned 172.18.1.0/24 network through BGP and has full access to this network.
I have few CP 1530 gateways on remote places and all of them are connected to the Maestro GW through IPsec tunnels in same star community. I want them to be able to reach 172.18.1.0/24 network, so I have defined this network in the VPN encryption domain and created "accept" policy rule. When I try to connect to the network not even log shows up and fails.
In theory, this should be really simple. What could be the issue?
Are all these 1530s managed with the same management?
Have you pushed policy to all relevant gateways?
What version/JHF is Maestro running and what firmware version/build # is used on the SMB appliances?
1. It is in different management
2. Yes I'm testing on exactly 2 gateways.
3. Maestro is R81.10/Take79 and SMB is running R80.30. I haven't checked the specific firmware version I will when I can.
What does the routing at the branches look like, are these gateways also performing NAT?
Branch gateways have just a simple default rule to the ISP IP address that it is connecting to. Also branches have 172.10.X.X/25 local network on the internal interface and thats where I want to connect to 172.18.1.0/24 from.
I tried changing the VPN routing option in the community to all 3 of the option.
VPN domain looks like this:
VPN domain of a branch GW = branch-local domain (172.10.X.X/25)
VPN domain of the Maestro = Maestro-local domain (172.18.1.0/24)
172.10.X.X/25 -> tunnel -> Maestro -> 172.18.1.0/24
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
User | Count |
---|---|
18 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
About CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY