Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
HeikoAnkenbrand
MVP Gold
MVP Gold

VSX on Check Point 9300/9400 Appliances

Recently, I heard through informal discussions among German SEs that using Check Point 9300 and 9400 appliances with VSX may not be the most optimal setup. The reason seems to be tied to the way energy-efficient cores and performance cores are distributed asynchronously within these platforms.

It is easy to imagine that such a mixed-core architecture could potentially lead to imbalances in performance when running demanding VSX environments. As VSX relies heavily on predictable CPU behavior across virtual systems, heterogeneous cores may introduce unexpected issues in processing consistency, latency, or throughput.

Appliance Performance cores Efficient cores Cores / Virtual cores
9300  6 4 10 / 16
9400

6

8 14 / 20

 

Questions:

  • Has Check Point made any official statement regarding this specific scenario?

  • Are there any known limitations or best practices for running VSX on 9300/9400 appliances with this CPU architecture?

  • What would be the recommended configuration to ensure stable and reliable operation in production environments?

➜ CCSM Elite, CCME, CCTE ➜ www.checkpoint.tips
(1)
5 Replies
Chris_Atkinson
MVP Gold CHKP MVP Gold CHKP
MVP Gold CHKP

 

There is only some limited / inconclusive discussion from other community members here to my knowledge:

https://community.checkpoint.com/t5/General-Topics/VSX-UPPAK-issues/m-p/258287

CCSM R77/R80/ELITE
HeikoAnkenbrand
MVP Gold
MVP Gold

Thanks for the info, @Chris_Atkinson.

My question is whether it makes sense to use the 9300/9400 in a VSX environment.

The problem is that when I assign, for example, 3 CoreXL instances to a virtual system via SmartConsole, it can happen that one E-core and two P-cores are used. This is highly suboptimal.

That’s why I’ve always statically assigned either E-cores or P-cores to the virtual systems. That works fine.

The only issue is that when it happens automatically, it leads to performance problems.

➜ CCSM Elite, CCME, CCTE ➜ www.checkpoint.tips
Chris_Atkinson
MVP Gold CHKP MVP Gold CHKP
MVP Gold CHKP

Understood but given the use case can be anything from MDPS like deployments to those much more complex / advanced it might be more subjective.

CCSM R77/R80/ELITE
0 Kudos
HeikoAnkenbrand
MVP Gold
MVP Gold

Is there an official statement from Check Point on this topic, or should I contact the German Partner SEs?

➜ CCSM Elite, CCME, CCTE ➜ www.checkpoint.tips
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

Your best bet is to reach out to your local Check Point office, yes.

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events