- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- General Topics
- :
- Take 65 or Take 70 - Impossible to install on 5800...
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Take 65 or Take 70 - Impossible to install on 5800 appliance R81.20
hi chaps, quick one as always from me. here is the scenario:
1. customer is having still under support R81.20 SG5800 running R81.20 take 631
2. Check_Point_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN_Bundle_T65_FULL.tgz
- this take cannot be installed as it is called by the installer (CPUSE) that this appliance is incompatible with that take - any clues what a heck? I've tried my lab 5800 - same stuff - no way to install this take due to some storage shortage?
# pvs
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/sda3 vg_splat lvm2 a-- 449.97g 236.97g
3. Check_Point_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN_Bundle_T70_FULL.tgz
- this take is downloaded and verified as fine then installation takes 15 mins and then - nothnig, back to sq. 1
- impossible to install as well as the previous one, any clues chaps?
*** will provide any output you wish, just let me know your thoughts should you have any (or experienced the same latelly).
Cheers!
ps. additional info's reg. validation processes:
R81.20 Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Recommended Jumbo Take 65
Package is available for installation (1 warnings)
● It was found that a hotfix (HF) preventing internal users from connecting to the Remote-Access VPN has been installed. Note that the behavior of the new Jumbo HF has changed: Remote Access VPN for local accounts authenticated only with Check Point password created in R80.20 or earlier, and not updated after R80.30 will be blocked until they reset their password.
R81.20 Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Take 70 Package is available for installation (1 warnings) ● It was found that a hotfix (HF) preventing internal users from connecting to the Remote-Access VPN has been installed. Note that the behavior of the new Jumbo HF has changed: Remote Access VPN for local accounts authenticated only with Check Point password created in R80.20 or earlier, and not updated after R80.30 will be blocked until they reset their password. |
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi @Jerry
Please note that R81.20 Jumbo above and including Take 65 can be installed only on top of R81.20 Take 634 ( due to the VPN CVE issue )
Thanks
Matan.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks Matan, so if that product is running R81.20 take 631, how do we get onto the "634" if any take currently available for that setup cannot be installed? any hints? any custom hotfix in order to get "634"?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You will certainly need to format the system.
From https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk173903:
If you use Bootable USB device, see instructions:
Effective June 3, 2024, the R81.20 Gaia images have been replaced with Take 634.
By installing the new image, you automatically install Preventative Hotfix for CVE-2024-24919 (see sk182336).Edit: You could maybe download the Blink and upgrade in place with the same version to change the baseline.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
so that means folks that the "634" is only for "brand new installations" therefore Take 65 and 70 are also only for BRAND NEW installations utilizing "634". So as long as the appliance runs R81.20 take 631 there would be NO WAY to install either Take 65 or 70 - am I thinking that right?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Jerry you are correct and it applies to any future jumbo we will release...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
ok. cheers
so does it mean that any applice or VM gaia R81.20 running 631 already, won't be able to bump up to the 634 without a full reinstall of the entire device from USB image? am I correct though?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
It seems to. Although I checked one my appliances still in R81.10 and the Blink with Take 65 refers to the 631 baseline.
Display name: R81.20 Security Gateway + JHF T65 for Appliances and Open Servers
File name: Blink_image_1.1_Check_Point_R81.20_T631_JHF_T65_SecurityGateway.tgz
Description: Blink Image for R81.20 Take 631 including Take 65 of R81.20 Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator - Security Gateway only
Size: 7.949 GB
Type: Blink Version
Status: Downloaded
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
yup, have had the same but that is the case with R81.10 already running.
I do have anothe vsx on 15000 series which runs just now take 70 on
Deployment Agent build: 2432 | R81.20 take 631
and all works fab!
so seems this is something what CP did not explain well on the latest CPX 😄
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
@Jerry and all
I'm deeply sorry I was confused with the scenario 😞
The scenario which I referred to was if you have R81.20 take 634 you can't install any jumbo below take 65 in order not to lose the CVE-2024-24919
The Jumbos can be installed on top R81.20 take 631
please open TAC case on it so they will investigate your issue
Thanks
and sorry again about the confusion
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks a lot for the clarification, indeed it is all about installing TAKES on the top of the R81.20 631 running already Take 54. No other (higher) takes can be installed hence my post.
I would have opened the SR with the TAC if I could believe it can be sorted out otherwise R&D will keep that case as the least important and in about 1 month one email will end up in my inbox asking for the Remote Session. I was there, I'm with CP since 1999 abd believe I just don't think this can be sorted as quickly as my customer expect. Neverthanless I'd like someone to look at this so I'm happy to provide cpinfo if needed and do the remote session if required.
ps. that CP5800 is a standalone installation (meaning that FWM is also running on it) but runs perfectly fine. Just no new takes cane be installed hence I don't believe anyone would have assume it is critical, indeed it isn't but would be great to know why and if those new TAKES could be installed normally (tried cpuse webUI, cpuse clish, bash tgz - same result or rather no result).
Cheers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Jerry,
Using DA 2432
The Flow is 5800 as a Stand Alone with 81.20 take 631 -> upgrade to JHF T65/70? No JHF or hotfix already installed on the machine?
The warnings you added in your original post, only appear if someone has the original hotfix for the VPN CVE installed on their machine. The warning appears because the initial fix was changed in the jumbo so the DDR gives the user a heads-up saying this behavior is now changed.
@Below
R81.20 Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Recommended Jumbo Take 65
Package is available for installation (1 warnings)
● It was found that a hotfix (HF) preventing internal users from connecting to the Remote-Access VPN has been installed. Note that the behavior of the new Jumbo HF has changed: Remote Access VPN for local accounts authenticated only with Check Point password created in R80.20 or earlier, and not updated after R80.30 will be blocked until they reset their password.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
R81.20 631 running already Take 54 and DA 2432.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Please send here cpinfo -y all
Also please share what you see in this file
/opt/CPInstLog/CRs_conflict_summary.txt
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
This is Check Point CPinfo Build 914000239 for GAIA
[MGMT]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
[IDA]
No hotfixes..
[CPFC]
No hotfixes..
[FW1]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JHF_T53_BLOCK_PORTAL_MAIN Take: 2
HOTFIX_R81_20_JHF_T53_BLOCK_INT_MAIN
HOTFIX_GOT_MGMT_AUTOUPDATE
HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
HOTFIX_VCE_R81_20_AUTOUPDATE
HOTFIX_NGM_DOCTOR_AUTOUPDATE
HOTFIX_WEBCONSOLE_AUTOUPDATE
HOTFIX_GOT_TPCONF_MGMT_AUTOUPDATE
HOTFIX_PUBLIC_CLOUD_CA_BUNDLE_AUTOUPDATE
HOTFIX_GOT_TPCONF_AUTOUPDATE
FW1 build number:
This is Check Point Security Management Server R81.20 - Build 011
This is Check Point's software version R81.20 - Build 025
kernel: R81.20 - Build 033
[SecurePlatform]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
HOTFIX_ENDER_V17_AUTOUPDATE
[CPinfo]
No hotfixes..
[PPACK]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
[AutoUpdater]
HOTFIX_INFRA_CONFIG_AUTOUPDATE
[DIAG]
No hotfixes..
[CVPN]
HOTFIX_ESOD_CSHELL_AUTOUPDATE
HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
[SmartLog]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
[Reporting Module]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
[CPuepm]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
[VSEC]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
[CPDepCon]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
[CPRepMan]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
[R7540CMP]
No hotfixes..
[R76CMP]
No hotfixes..
[SFWR77CMP]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JHF_COMP Take: 54
[SFWR80CMP]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JHF_COMP Take: 54
[SFWR81CMP]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JHF_COMP Take: 54
[R77CMP]
No hotfixes..
[R8040CMP]
HOTFIX_R81_20_JHF_COMP Take: 54
[MGMTAPI]
No hotfixes..
[CPUpdates]
BUNDLE_R81_20_JHF_T53_BLOCK_PORTAL_MAIN Take: 2
BUNDLE_INFRA_CONFIG_AUTOUPDATE Take: 3
BUNDLE_CPOTLPAGENT_AUTOUPDATE Take: 26
BUNDLE_GENERAL_AUTOUPDATE Take: 21
BUNDLE_QUID_AUTOUPDATE Take: 14
BUNDLE_ESOD_CSHELL_AUTOUPDATE Take: 20
BUNDLE_R81_20_JUMBO_HF_MAIN Take: 54
BUNDLE_GOT_MGMT_AUTOUPDATE Take: 129
BUNDLE_CORE_FILE_UPLOADER_AUTOUPDATE Take: 21
BUNDLE_VCE_R81_20_AUTOUPDATE Take: 15
BUNDLE_ENDER_V17_AUTOUPDATE Take: 26
BUNDLE_MINMUS_AUTOUPDATE Take: 23
BUNDLE_KERBIN_AUTOUPDATE Take: 47
BUNDLE_TUNNEL_AUTOUPDATE Take: 117
BUNDLE_DANA_AUTOUPDATE Take: 170
BUNDLE_CPSDC_AUTOUPDATE Take: 34
BUNDLE_HCP_AUTOUPDATE Take: 73
BUNDLE_CPVIEWEXPORTER_AUTOUPDATE Take: 34
BUNDLE_CPOTELCOL_AUTOUPDATE Take: 97
BUNDLE_NGM_DOCTOR_AUTOUPDATE Take: 23
BUNDLE_WEBCONSOLE_AUTOUPDATE Take: 114
BUNDLE_GOT_TPCONF_MGMT_AUTOUPDATE Take: 39
BUNDLE_DC_CONTENT_AUTOUPDATE Take: 20
BUNDLE_DC_INFRA_AUTOUPDATE Take: 30
BUNDLE_PUBLIC_CLOUD_CA_BUNDLE_AUTOUPDATE Take: 21
BUNDLE_INFRA_AUTOUPDATE Take: 67
BUNDLE_DEP_INSTALLER_AUTOUPDATE Take: 27
BUNDLE_GOT_TPCONF_AUTOUPDATE Take: 128
[itp_wrapper]
HOTFIX_GOT_MGMT_AUTOUPDATE
[CPotelcol]
HOTFIX_OTLP_GA
[CPviewExporter]
HOTFIX_OTLP_GA
[core_uploader]
HOTFIX_CHARON_HF
[hcp_wrapper]
HOTFIX_HCP_AUTOUPDATE
[cpsdc_wrapper]
HOTFIX_CPSDC_AUTOUPDATE
[sho_wrapper]
HOTFIX_DANA_AUTOUPDATE
[infinity_onprem_wrapper]
HOTFIX_TUNNEL_AUTOUPDATE
[diff_report_wrapper]
HOTFIX_KERBIN_AUTOUPDATE
HOTFIX_MINMUS_AUTOUPDATE
[CPDepInst]
No hotfixes..
[CPquid]
HOTFIX_QUID_AUTOUPDATE
[CPotlpAgent]
HOTFIX_OTLP_GA
***
# cat /opt/CPInstLog/CRs_conflict_summary.txt
cat: /opt/CPInstLog/CRs_conflict_summary.txt: No such file or directory
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi you have Take 54 JHF without a hotfix installed on top of take 53 JHF with the hotfix for VPN
Please try to uninstall take 54 JHF and then try to install JHF Take 65/70
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks Max, are you sure it is safe to uninstall 54 then reboot and install 65 then 70 ? I would be left on that box with Take 53 I presume. Please confirm and I'll proceed as recommended.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Uninstall_Last_Take Failed
There are hotfixes installed on top of R81.20 Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Take 54.
Uninstall the hotfix(es) HOTFIX_R81_20_JHF_T53_BLOCK_INT_MAIN, HOTFIX_R81_20_JHF_T53_BLOCK_PORTAL_MAIN and try again.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The issue here is that you have installed hotfixes which are meant for take 53 on top of take 54 and this is why you are running into issues.
Please try to uninstall the hotfixes and then move to take 65/70 (these jumbos include the VPN fixes inside of them)
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I was just about to say the same thing, makes total logical sense to me.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
and then this:
Uninstall_Last_Take of package Check_Point_R81_20_JHF_T53_BLOCK_PORTAL_MAIN_Bundle_T2_FULL.tgz Failed
Backup file not found.
Contact Check Point Technical Services for further assistance.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Since your system has hotfixes which were based on T53 and you had JHF 54 there are some issues. In general this should not have worked from the get go -I'll look into that.
Regardless since now you are unable to uninstall the hotfixes which would solve the issue, let's schedule a remote session on Sunday please.
maxfr@checkpoint.com
Please reach out and we will schedule to help remove the hotfixes from your env and let you upgrade to take 65/70
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
email sent Max. thanks a bunch for your help here!
Cheers
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hey m8,
If you need me to build brand new VM with exact version you require of R81.20 jumbo, please let me know or hit me up on teams, HAPPY to do it and send you any files needed. Man, eve-ng is GOLD, takes literally 10 mins to do this, 5 for Fortinet, I think took less than 3 mins for Palo Alto haha
Best,
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Cheers mate I really appreciate that but hold on, I'm going on the session with Max this sunday and we'll see how it goes. I guess we do need to do some housekeeping with that box and uninstall/install JHF/s as they've been installed apparently in a wrong order. So all in all I will let you know next week but so far - many many thanks as always. you guys all ROCK! 🙂
Cheerio!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thats what SHE said m8 😉
Just kidding, no one ever said that 😂😂
Hope all goes well! Btw, truth be told, every time I did remote with anyone from Israel office, issue got fixed right then and there, so I have no doubt you are in good hands.
And finally, thank you for NOT being stroppy with me...;)
Just teasing you, always pleasure to help my friend.
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Never knew of that file, thats super helpful @Max_Frankl ...thank you!
Andy
R81.20 lab:
[Expert@CP-GW:0]# more /opt/CPInstLog/CRs_conflict_summary.txt
Package: R81.20 Take 53 Hotfix for CVE-2024-24919
conflicts with the following hotfixes:
R81.20 Jumbo Hotfix Accumulator Take 70
For more information - see log files:
/opt/CPInstLog/CRSValidator_fw1_wrapper_R81_20_JHF_T53_BLOCK_PORTAL_MAIN
.log
[Expert@CP-GW:0]
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I'm looking into this thank you
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Broooooo, nice to see you here again 🙂
Glad you had not been STROPPY with me lately 😉
Anywho, sorry, did not read the whole thing, but did you try installer install from clish?
Andy
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
hey maaaatey yes I did, still the same 🙂 read above pls.
