- CheckMates
- :
- Products
- :
- General Topics
- :
- Re: R80.20 ICA Management Tool
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page
Are you a member of CheckMates?
×- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
R80.20 ICA Management Tool
Hi guys!, i have an issue trying to to generate a certificate from a request (pkcs10), the message i get is "Failed Creating Certificate. Got Bad input" (Image attached).... same request on a box with R80.10 its working ... but not on R80.20
SK That i used for setting up ICA Management Tool Setting up the ICA Management Tool
I am trying to complete a certificate from an SMB Appliance for VPN - i am using this sk https://supportcenter.checkpoint.com/supportcenter/portal?eventSubmit_doGoviewsolutiondetails=&solut...9
any of you guys have been into something similar?
Thanks & Regards
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If it does work correctly on R80.10 i would involve TAC - sounds like a bug...
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You obviously followed the procedure I described for locally managed SMB appliances here:
HowTo Set Up Certificate Based VPNs with Check Point Appliances - R77 edition
I suggest try a different browser, start the ICA Management Tool with our ccc script and then access it via http://10.1.1.100:18265, or use the cpca_client command in expert mode to perform the same action on CLI as you are trying to perform in your web browser.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thanks for the Responses, i opened a case with TAC, turns out that on version R80.20 you need to remove the
"-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE REQUEST------" and "-----END CERTIFICATE REQUEST-----"
Just paste the certificate without this and works fine, strange that its not the way it works ons previous versions R77.30 and R80.10
but it is succesfully on that way
Thanks again. mates!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Did you already ask if there is an sk for this issue ? Such a big change must be documented in the sk(s) (sk109139 / sk30501 / sk94028).
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Hi Eduardo
Can you share the ticket number please - I would like to get to the bottom of this and find out what was changed. Having the SR number would really help
Thanks,
Uri
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Thank you for posting the solution!
