- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
What’s New in Agentic Network Orchestration
21 October @ 5pm CET / 11am EDT
AI Security Masters
LGTM: Bypassing an LLM Build Gate
When Prompt Injection Fails
Scaling Check Point Automation with Arodonata
CheckMates Go:
Fun Ding
I’m happy to announce the availability of new Network Interface Card (NIC) for our Quantum Force lineup – “CPAC-4-10/25F-DA”.
The relevant collateral is updated accordingly
Regards,
Yaron Weiler
Head of product management, Security Gateway Appliances and Maestro
What exactly is this accelerating? Is there more details on this module?
currently we accelerate firewall at a line-rate, whereas in the future we plan to accelerate additional capabilities such as IPSec VPN
What about https inspection as this is a key thing.
we are exploring it via internal POCs but no clear direction yet
This would be a really big thing as many of the community have pointed out the lack of hardware based inspection, for medium sized appliances ie. 9xxx.
Excellent point @genisis__
Aligned / compatible with the acceleration capabilities, currently supported on the CPAC-2-40/100F-D NIC is my understanding.
Refer also: https://sc1.checkpoint.com/documents/Appliances/100G_Ports_AdminGuide/Content/Topics-100G-Card-AG/In...
correct
9100-9300 not listed, so I would hope these models would be in scope of the new module.
The interface mapping references it here but I'm sure @Yaron_Weiler will confirm.
the new NIC is compatible with all Quantum Force GWs, starting 9100 and above
Within the WebGUI is it visible somehow that these NIC support accelerations?
Same question for CLI.
If its not, would it be possible to add it in the GUI maybe as a lightning (similar as the policy push)
regards,
Magnus
Good news!
Will there be an increase in performance in Firewall mode on appliances with this card?
Datasheet for 9100 says 55 Gbps in Firewall mode, can I expect 4x25=100 Gbps in Firewall mode when installing this card?
That's the current use case: accelerating firewall traffic.
And by this we mean only traffic that is fully accelerated in SecureXL (ie does not require Medium Path).
VPN is not included this at present.
Good question. I would like to see an answer to this. The appliance comparison chart says nothing about acceleration. The performance values in this chart are the same before and after the launching of the accelerated modules.
I checked data sheet as well, but nothing there either.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 51 | |
| 10 | |
| 8 | |
| 6 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 |
Tue 20 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
EMEA: Beyond the Basics: Designing Identity Awareness for Large-Scale EnvironmentsTue 20 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (EDT)
AMER: Beyond the Basics: Designing Identity Awareness for Large-Scale EnvironmentsThu 22 Oct 2026 @ 11:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Cloud Security as a Service – Combining WAFaaS and CFaaSTue 20 Oct 2026 @ 05:00 PM (CEST)
EMEA: Beyond the Basics: Designing Identity Awareness for Large-Scale EnvironmentsTue 20 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (EDT)
AMER: Beyond the Basics: Designing Identity Awareness for Large-Scale EnvironmentsThu 29 Oct 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Under the Hood: Check Point Security Management | From Intent to Automation with Agentic AIThu 29 Oct 2026 @ 03:00 PM (EDT)
Americas Deep Live: What's New in Check Point Firewall R82.20Thu 29 Oct 2026 @ 11:00 AM (PDT)
Irvine, CA: Secure the Network, the App, and the Workforce: A Hybrid Mesh & SASE BriefingAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY