- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
MVP 2026: Submissions
Are Now Open!
What's New in R82.10?
Watch NowOverlap in Security Validation
Help us to understand your needs better
CheckMates Go:
Maestro Madness
Hi,
currenty I'm experimenting with Logical Servers.
So far it works fine but there is one point on my list I'm unable to resolve.
I need to access my logical server from inside the same subnet as the VIP and the real servers.
I managed to set up proxy arp so reqests are forwardet from GW to destination server(s).
Packets are recevived from server(s) but as the src. address is located in the same subnet the replays are send to src directly.
Aswer packets arrive at the client but with real server IP and not VIP -> packets did not pass trough GW so no reverse NAT happend.
To resolve this I think I only have to src-NAT all my connections if they are from same subnet to an IP which is behind Gateway (from servers view)
BUT as ConnectControl is only a more inteligent destination NAT method working as impied rule (0) my src.Nat rules will never match.
Thank you for reading 🙂
/BR
Sascha
Hi,
"Any" in original was the first attempt I made (CISS)
But install aborts: "Invalid <Any> in Source of Address Translation Rule ##. <Any> is valid only it the matching Translated column is <Original>"
But many thanks to you, your reply pushed me back to test with NAT and I found a solution:
Here is the summary what the tasks are to make an logical-server reachable from the same subnet:
Thank you very much for spending your time with my problems.
Best regards,
Sascha
What specific NAT rules have you tried?
I've tried:
ORG-SRC; ORG-DST; ORG-SRV; TRA-SRC; TRA-DST; TRA-SRV
Subnet-of-VIP; VIP; ANY; Subnet-of-VIP-GW-IP(Hide); Original; Original
In log I can see that NAT rule 0 matched (Which is the Logical-Server magic) but my NAT rule did not match.
I think you might have to make Original Source "any" in this context.
Hi,
"Any" in original was the first attempt I made (CISS)
But install aborts: "Invalid <Any> in Source of Address Translation Rule ##. <Any> is valid only it the matching Translated column is <Original>"
But many thanks to you, your reply pushed me back to test with NAT and I found a solution:
Here is the summary what the tasks are to make an logical-server reachable from the same subnet:
Thank you very much for spending your time with my problems.
Best regards,
Sascha
I'm glad you figured it out ![]()
I was actually trying to find how we did this with AWS and ELBs, which also used these objects.
I believe you need to do something similar with NAT rules there.
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 12 | |
| 10 | |
| 9 | |
| 8 | |
| 6 | |
| 3 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 2 | |
| 1 |
Tue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsTue 16 Dec 2025 @ 05:00 PM (CET)
Under the Hood: CloudGuard Network Security for Oracle Cloud - Config and Autoscaling!Thu 18 Dec 2025 @ 10:00 AM (CET)
Cloud Architect Series - Building a Hybrid Mesh Security Strategy across cloudsAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY