Create a Post
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Gennady
Explorer

64000 Chassis - capture traffic on BPEthX interface

Hi, everyone!

We have a strange problem in a customer environment. There are rx_length_errors constantly increasing on BPEth0 and BPEth1 interfaces. We can see that there are no rx_undersize or rx_oversize in the output of ethtool -S BPEthX.

#ethtool -S BPEth1 | grep 'port.rx_undersize\|port.rx_oversize\|port.rx_length_erro

     rx_length_errors: 172188

     port.rx_length_errors: 172188

     port.rx_undersize: 0

     port.rx_oversize: 0

 

#ethtool -S BPEth1 | grep 'port.rx_undersize\|port.rx_oversize\|port.rx_length_erro

     rx_length_errors: 172192

     port.rx_length_errors: 172192

     port.rx_undersize: 0

     port.rx_oversize: 0

I have tried to capture traffic on BPEthX interface of our lab Chassis 64000. 99% of traffic is CCP and ARPs. There is no production traffic in tpcdump or cppcap. It looks like SecureXL doing the same thing as with VSX wrpj interfaces.

What is the procedure to capture all frames which are passing via back-plane interfaces?

What may be the reason for the strange rx_length_errors?

 

0 Kudos
1 Reply
PhoneBoy
Admin
Admin

I'd consult with TAC here.

0 Kudos

Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

Upcoming Events

    CheckMates Events