This website uses Cookies. Click Accept to agree to our website's cookie use as described in our Privacy Policy. Click Preferences to customize your cookie settings.
Accept
Reject
Preferences
ABOUT CHECKMATES CYBER SECURITY COMMUNITY & FAQ
Create a Post
Help
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Are you a member of CheckMates?

×
Sign in with your Check Point UserCenter/PartnerMap account to access more great content and get a chance to win some Apple AirPods! If you don't have an account, create one now for free!
Hugo_vd_Kooij
MVP Gold
MVP Gold
‎2026-02-26 01:13 AM

user.def file missed during upgrade

Hi,

During an upgrade from R81.20  (Take 99?) to R82 (take 60) it seems the user.def file was missed in the reports as being changed.The verify step spotted the crypt.def and table.def files in the upgrade. But never mentioned the user.def file.

As the gateways run R81.20 the mutations were never put in the corresponding user.def file for R81.20 gateways.

In previous upgrades the user.def was properly listed as needing attention.

Has anyone else observed this behaviour?

 

<< We make miracles happen while you wait. The impossible jobs take just a wee bit longer. >>
0 Kudos
2 Replies
the_rock
MVP Diamond
MVP Diamond
‎2026-02-26 03:43 AM

Dont ever recall seeing that myself in the lab.

Best,
Andy
"Have a great day and if its not, change it"
0 Kudos
Martijn
MVP
MVP
‎2026-02-27 07:10 AM

Hi,

I assume you used the latest version of the R82 tools.

Maybe there is a small bug in the current version. This week I have migrated a R81.10 database to R82 and the verify mentioned user_early.def was altered. But when checking the file, it was default and had no custom settings.

Regards,
Martijn


Leaderboard

Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.

View All ≫
Upcoming Events

    Sort by:
    CheckMates Events