- Products
- Learn
- Local User Groups
- Partners
- More
Step Into the Future of
AI-Powered Cyber Security
The State of Ransomware Q1 2026
Key Trends and Their Impact
AI Security Masters E8:
Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber Security
Blueprint Architecture for Securing
The AI Factory & AI Data Center
Call For Papers
Your Expertise. Our Stage
CheckMates Go:
CheckMates Fest
SMS: R81.10 JHF 152 - GW: R81.10 JHF 150
It seems the reference numbers for our UserCheck do not match. Has anyone come across this before? I was not finding anything on a quick search.
I'm having a hard time replicating the issue. Everything I have tested this afternoon has come back proper, but yeah the databases are up-to-date.
Hm, never paid attention to it, but have fully working https inspection in R81.20 and R82, so let me verify.
Andy
Maybe if you are using custom user check, default ones work fine, though I also verified custom one in my labs, no issues. I tested both R82 and R81.20, different categories, all match 100%
Andy
We are using a custom page, but we are using the built-in Incident ID variable just as you are.
Dies it show same for any category?
Andy
Yeah, the category matches. What is interesting is that the log message says it displayed the proper reference ID, but it didn't.
I meant is ID different no matter what category is blocked? Did you make sure app control and urlf databases are updated from smart console?
Andy
I'm having a hard time replicating the issue. Everything I have tested this afternoon has come back proper, but yeah the databases are up-to-date.
Happy to show you my lab on Tuesday, as its holiday here in Canada on Monday and you can verify anything needed. My lab works 100% of the time, no issues when it comes to https inspection. Yes, its basic, but very good reference.
Andy
Thanks! I'll keep that in mind, but we are okay for now.
I was thinking it could be a webpage cache issue on the PC, but I searched our logs and found nothing tied to that reference number in the last 120 days. Since I can't recreate it, I think I will let it go for now.
K, no worries. If you need help, hit me up any time, lab is always in "good standing" 🙂
Andy
Leaderboard
Epsum factorial non deposit quid pro quo hic escorol.
| User | Count |
|---|---|
| 28 | |
| 13 | |
| 12 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 5 |
Tue 12 May 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall delivered as a serviceWed 13 May 2026 @ 11:00 AM (EDT)
TechTalk: The State of Ransomware Q1 2026: Key Trends and Their ImpactThu 14 May 2026 @ 07:00 PM (EEST)
Under the Hood: Presentando Check Point Cloud Firewall como ServicioTue 12 May 2026 @ 10:00 AM (CEST)
The Cloud Architects Series: Check Point Cloud Firewall delivered as a serviceTue 19 May 2026 @ 06:00 PM (IDT)
AI Security Masters E8 - Claude Mythos: New Era in Cyber SecurityAbout CheckMates
Learn Check Point
Advanced Learning
YOU DESERVE THE BEST SECURITY